Film Review “Sal”

Starring: Val Lauren and James Franco
Directed by: James Franco
Rated: R
Running time: 1 hour 43 mins
Tribeca Films

Our Score: 3 out of 5 stars

“No, no, no, Sal Mineo, I would never stoop so low.”

The above line is from the song “Look At Me, I’m Sandra Dee” made popular in the Broadway musical, “Grease.” In the film version the line has been removed and replaced with one about Elvis. The reason? On February 12, 1976 Sal Mineo was stabbed to death and the lyrics were changed out of respect for a talent that left this world too soon. And it is that talent (and drive) that makes up the story of “Sal.”

We meet Sal Mineo (a mesmerizing Val Lauren) as he works out at the gym. Having just turned 37 Mineo presents himself as a man ten years younger. A quick lunch with his agent, who is brokering a film project Sal is involved in, and it’s off to rehearsal of a new play he is starring in. Though Sal doesn’t know it, this will be his last day on earth and he’s doing his best to make the most of it.

Filmed almost exclusively in close-ups on practically bare sets, “Sal” rides almost exclusively on the muscular shoulders of Lauren. It is a brilliant performance, with the young actor perfectly catching the tone and cadence of Mineo’s speech and demeanor. This is not simply an impersonation, this is an actor that has gone “all in” on a performance and doesn’t disappoint. At the time of his death, Mineo was starring in an Los Angeles-based production of the play, “P.S. Your Cat Is Dead” and parts of “Sal” eavesdrop on a rehearsal. We take the rehearsal in via the back of the head of the director (Franco), whose face we never see. What we do see is the pure pleasure that Mineo felt whenever he was performing. Though he was a two-time Academy Award nominee, Mineo’s star began to fade in the 1960s. His final film appearance put him behind a mask when he played Dr. Milo in “Escape From the Planet of the Apes.”

Technically the film is almost documentary in style. Director Franco’s use of close-ups, single cameras and long takes ensure that the only thing that will occupy the screen are the performances. As a tribute to its subject I wouldn’t want to see it any other way.

Film Review “Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa”

Starring: Johnny Knoxville and Jackson Nicoll
Directed by: Jeff Tremaine
Rated: R
Running time: 1 hour 32 mins
Paramount

Our Score: 5 out of 5 stars

When you think of a film by the people behind “Jackass” what words come to mind? “Outrageous?” “Over the top?” “How in the hell did they do that?” Well their latest collaboration, “Bad Grandpa,” can certainly be described by those words. And don’t forget “Hilarious.” Heck, I’d even add “Even Touching.”

No, I’m not kidding.

We meet 86 year old Irving Zisman (Knoxville in some incredible make-up) shortly after his wife has passed away. To add to his bad news his daughter (Georgina Cates) informs him that she is heading back to prison. She asks her pop to please take her 8 year old son, Billy (Nicoll) from Nebraska to North Carolina to drop him off with his father. Irving is reluctant at first but, seeing she has no other choice, agrees. Thus begins the ultimate road trip.

Like “Borat” before it, “Bad Grandpa” is a hidden camera experiment taken to new heights. Knoxville is so skilled in his performance that he manages to convince anyone he encounters that he is a kindly old man who’s just having a string of bad luck. Be it an estate sale gone bad, a funeral service gone even worse or a night of drinking at a St. Louis bar featuring male dancers, director Tremaine’s cameras catch everyday people at their best (and, to be honest, most of the people do take a liking to gramps and Billy). I think it has something to do with respecting your elders. When in one scene Grandpa tries to ship Billy to North Carolina packed in a box at a local shipping store, the ladies assisting him go to great lengths to help him. EVEN AFTER THEY LEARN THERE IS A LITTLE BOY IN THE BOX!

What makes the film special are the moments between the “bits” — when Billy and Grandpa are alone, talking about fishing and the future. You almost forget you’re watching a seriously “R” rated comedy, so endearing are Knoxville and Nicoll. I’d love to see these two characters on screen again.

New York Film Festival Review “12 Years a Slave”

Starring: Chiwetel Ejiofor, Michael Fassbender, Lupita Nyong’o, Benedict Cumberbatch, Paul Dano
Directed By: Steve McQueen
Fox Searchlight
Rated: R
Running Time: 133 minutes

Our Score: 5 out of 5 stars

As evidenced by his first two features, Hunger and Shame, director Steve McQueen is fearless in his approach to difficult subject matters. The same is true here in his unflinching and unforgettable third feature, 12 Years a Slave.

The film is based on the true life account of Solomon Northup (played by Chiwetel Ejiofor), a free black man in New York who was deceived and sold into a life of slavery from 1841 to 1853. The film opens with Northup already in this role working on a sugar cane plantation and then brings us back to his family life in New York leading up to his deception. The men who will eventually drug and betray him come in the form of Brown and Hamilton, played by Scoot McNairy and Taran Killam, who offer Solomon the promise of violin work in Washington DC. The whole sequence is reminiscent of a sort of hellish version of Pinocchio being lead off by the circus folk and it plays out with a dreadful inevitability that left my stomach churning. When Solomon is awoken in chains, Ejiofor’s bewilderment is heart-wrenching as he struggles between fighting for his identity and recognizing how powerless he’s just been rendered.

Ejiofor is at the center of an embarrassment of acting talent throughout this film with even smaller roles occupied by the likes of Brad Pitt, Michael K Williams, Paul Giamatti, Paul Dano, and last year’s Oscar nominee Quvenzhané Wallis (Beasts of the Southern Wild). Benedict Cumberbatch has a key role as Ford, Northrup’s first owner. Ford is initially presented as a sympathetic man, even seen as such by Solomon himself, but the way McQueen and screenwriter John Ridley disillusion us of the very notion of this idea is masterful. For all Ford’s sympathetic looks and guilt about the institution he is undoubtably a part of, he will still allow a family to be split at auction and won’t hear a word of Solomon’s story despite recognizing his intelligence. Actions speak louder than words and under Ford, Solomon still suffers through some of the harshest tortures in the film. Including selling Solomon off again to the monstrous Edwin Epps in the film’s final act.

Coming from both Hunger and Shame, Michael Fassbender successfully reteams with director McQueen again as Epps. Fassbender is fascinating to watch as his character rages against his slaves with frightening conviction he backs up with biblical scripture. He is further driven to violence by his complete inability to deal with his unhinged infatuation with his most productive slave girl, Patsey (incredible newcomer Lupita Nyong’o).

Truly however the film belongs to Chiwetel Ejifor who imbues Northup with an unwavering determination to not only survive his ordeal, but as he says, to live. To not give into despair. Moreover when it comes to his re-emancipation, we feel the weight of the time lost as much as the relief of freedom.

12 Years A Slave opens is now playing , I screened it as part of the 51st New York Film Festival, you can read our red carpet coverage from the event with an interview from the film’s star Michael Fassbender.

Film Review “Man of Tai Chi”

Directed by: Keanu Reeves
Starring: Tiger Chen, Keanu Reeves, Karen Mok, Simon Yam, Iko Uwais
Distributed by: Radius TWC
MPAA Rating: R
Running time: 105 minutes

Our Score: 3.5 out of 5 stars

If you have ever seen the Celebrity Jeopardy skits on “Saturday Night Live”, then you will be laughing along with me with Keanu Reeves saying “I know Kung Fu!” Classic! Keanu Reeves though deserves more respect than he gets. This guy really takes his craft seriously and put a lot of time and effort into this film, which also marks his directorial debut. I had a blast watching this. It was fast paced and very well done with impressive martial arts. I also enjoyed that Keanu was in the film but it wasn’t his show only. Tiger Chen is a great lead and carries the film well.

Set in modern Beijing, the film follows the spiritual journey of a young martial artist Tiger Chen, who is the sole student of his elderly master’s Ling Kong Tai Chi style. When Donaka Mark (Keanu Reeves) finds out about Tiger’s style in fighting he recruits him to compete in a highly lucrative underworld fight club. While trying to prove the martial effectiveness of the style in Donaka’s fighting ring, he is put up against some very brutal opponents with no rules combat. As the fights intensifies, so does his will to survive.

I have to say that “Man of Tai Chi” is a ballsy first go at directing for Reeves. It has been in the works for a while with pre-production starting back in 2008. The film is also not an easy sell to mainstream audiences since it was filmed multilingual with English, Mandarin and Cantonese languages. Currently the film is available to watch on VOD and will be released in theaters on November 1st. I have a feeling that this film will not be getting a huge release but it has been getting some great reviews and hopefully word of mouth will spread to get this film the audience that it deserves.

If you like martial arts films, I would definitely recommend checking this out. It is set in modern day yet has this very classic martial arts feel and high respect for the art of Tai Chi. I hope that Keanu has more plans for directing in the future, since this guy really has a knack for this. Aside from this, you are also going to want to check out his next film “47 Ronin”, being released Christmas Day, which is an fantasy action film depicting a fictional account of the forty-seven ronin and set in 18th-century Japan. I will be first in line!

 

Related Content

Film Review “Carrie (2013)”

Starring: Chloe Grace Moretz and Julianne Moore
Directed by: Kimberly Peirce
Rated: R
Running time: 1 hour 40 mins
MGM

Our Score: 1 out of 5 stars

November 3, 1976. A date I remember for one reason. This was my first night working as a movie theatre usher at the Twin Bays 4 in Tampa. It was also opening night for a new film called “Carrie.” The date sticks in my head because, at the end of the first evening show, during the “shock” ending, a woman in an aisle seat had a heart attack and fell out of her chair into the aisle. At least we all thought it was a heart attack. She left via ambulance and was apparently ok but still….. Almost four decades later director Kimberly Peirce and company have conspired to destroy a great memory of mine with their unnecessary and not welcome remake of “Carrie.”

We meet Margaret White (Moore) as she lay in a blood stained bed, cursing the cancer in her body that she thinks is killing her. Apparently Margaret never took health in school because she is soon joined by a beautiful baby girl. Hell bent on killing the newborn Margaret hovers over the child with a pair of scissors. But at the last moment she decides to keep the baby and give her a loving home. Yeah, right.

Now 18 we find the now grown up Carrie White (Moretz) in gym class playing water volleyball. It’s obvious she doesn’t want to participate but she makes the effort. When a ball splashes in front of her she is teased by Chris Hargensen (Portia Doubleday) and some of the other “cool” girls. Afterwards, as she showers alone, she notices blood on her body. Unaware that she is having her monthly period (apparently none of the women in the White family went to health class) she believes she is hurt and begs the other girls for help. In reply they began to throw tampons at her, urging her to “plug it up!” To make matters worse, Chris films the horrific moment on her cell phone. A typical day in the life of Carrie White.

Where to start? I dislike reviewing “remakes” because often the good feelings I have toward the original film seep into my thoughts about the new version. Not the case here. When I left the theatre after this remake it only made me appreciate the original film more. In fact, I wanted to punch everyone involved with the making of this one. In the 1976 version Carrie is a shy, timid girl unaware that she has been granted the power of telekinesis. Here she not only becomes aware of her powers but works hard to hone them. When Sue Snell (Gabriella Wilde) one of the girls who mocked her in gym class, begins to feel bad about her actions she encourages her boyfriend, Tommy Ross (Ansel Elgort) to ask Carrie to the prom instead of her. Tommy is reluctant but eventually agrees. After all, it’s the prom. What could go wrong?

Poorly directed with no sense of pace or, for that matter, atmosphere, “Carrie” is probably one of the worse films I’ve ever seen that has “A” list talent both in front of and behind the camera. Moore plays Margaret White like a just escaped lunatic who spends her free time listening to hymns and cutting herself. How this woman was ever allowed to keep a baby, let alone raise her, is utterly amazing. Moretz is also all over the place. Is she the sad and frightened victim or the cunningly shrewd mastermind of what turns out to be one hell of a prom? We don’t know or at least we’re not sure until the film ends, but I think the term finding busy work applies. Mama White is, of course, not pleased with Carrie’s sassiness, praying that God will come and end her daughter’s “wickedness.” I was doing the same thing praying for the end of the film. Both leads try hard but compared to 1976 stars Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie, they pale in comparison. Both Spacek and Laurie were Oscar nominated for their work. To tell you who hard an achievement that is for a horror film, it would be another 20 years before Sigourney Weaver was nominated for “Aliens.” With the exception of Elgort, the rest of the teen cast helps bring the film down more. Besides Carrie and Mama, Tommy is the only fleshed out character in the film. I don’t know what movie Doubleday thought she was making but it sure wasn’t a horror film. There is no menace in her performance. There is no emotion whatsoever. She could be reading the phone book. In Stephen King’s novel the story is told through the words of Sue Snell but here Sue is an almost forgotten character.

As for Carrie’s powers, they run the gambit from being able to move books to, I’m guessing, heat vision. She can also make herself fly. And she breaks a lot of mirrors. Director Peirce seems to have a fixation with glass here. Especially showing, in slow motion, an unfortunate actors face making contact with it, be it a door or a windshield. By the end of the film, when a pigs blood drenched Carrie began ambling down the street like she just walked off the set of “Michael Jackson’s Thriller” video, I let out a loud sigh and checked my watch for the tenth time.

Kimberly Peirce guided Hilary Swank to her first Oscar with her directorial debut “Boys Don’t Cry.” Her follow up, “Stop Loss,” was one of my favorite films of 2008. Sadly the third time is not the charm. The film plays like a blood soaked version of “The Breakfast Club.” Or “Sixteen Candles.” Or any other teen angst movie. I expected more from her, as I did the stars. I have faith that all three ladies will bounce back from this debacle. I hope it’s soon.

Film Review “Escape Plan”

Starring: Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Directed by: Mikael Hafstrom
Rated: R
Running time: 1 hour 56 mins
Summit Entertainment

Our Score: 3 out of 5 stars

It seemed like a great idea. Take two of the biggest box office giants of their time and pair them up in a movie. It happened almost three decades ago when Warner Brothers teamed up Clint Eastwood and Burt Reynolds in the period comedy, “City Heat.” Now it’s happening again as two of the biggest action stars of all time share top billing in the new drama “Escape Plan.”

While sitting in his prison cell Ray Breslin (Stallone) gets the heads up from a fellow inmate – watch your back in the yard. Later that afternoon he takes action and finds himself in solitary confinement. He promptly escapes. That’s his job. Ray isn’t a criminal. He’s the world’s foremost expert in confinement facilities. Governments hire him to test their latest prisons, placing him inside without the knowledge of the warden or staff. Ray runs a successful security company with his partner Lester Clark (Vincent D’Onofrio). The two are visited by a representative of a US government agency. There is a new prison that has been built to house the nastiest criminals ever assembled in one place. A prison that no one knows exists. For giving it a look Ray will receive $5 million. Piece of cake.

Fun to watch, “Escape Plan” is pretty much what you would expect with the first time teaming of Sly and Arnold (the “Expendables” films don’t count). Once inside Breslin makes the acquaintance of Swan Rottmayer (Schwarzenegger). A trial friendship grows as Ray does his best to find a weakness in the system. The place is run by a sadistic warden named Hobbes (Jim Caviezel). After a quick dose of Hobbes punishment Ray reveals himself to Hobbes, who sneers back and refuses to accept his story. Enjoy your time behind bars, Ray. You’re never getting out.

Director Halstrof, who also did “The Rite” and “1408,” has crafted a simple, fun action film that should entertain fans of both leads. Both stars have some fine moments, alone and together. Both Stallone and Schwarzenegger gained their popularity by kicking ass and saying little, only taking the time to blurt out the occasional quotable line or two. They are joined in their breakout plans by Faran Tahir, the Islamic leader of a rival faction of inmates who decides that teaming up with Sly and Arnold is better then praying to a sun he never gets to see. The stars have fun with their surroundings and with each other and some of their predicaments and situations are pretty amazing, as is the film itself. Let’s hope it doesn’t take another three decades for the actors to team up again.

Film Review “Paradise”

Directed and Written by: Diablo Cody
Starring: Julianne Hough, Russell Brand, Octavia Spencer, Nick Offerman and Holly Hunter
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Distributed by: RLJ Entertainment
Running Time: 86 minutes

Our Score: 2.5 out of 5 stars

After watching “Young Adult”, I realized that I am simply not a fan of “Academy Award®-winner” Diablo Cody. “Juno” was an interesting film but since then I have not been a huge big fan of her work. “Paradise” marks her feature directorial debut which also comes from her own original screenplay. I was curious about this film due to its cast, which stars Julianne Hough (“Rock of Ages”, “Footloose”), Russell Brand (“Get Him to the Greek”), Octavia Spencer (Academy Award-winner for “The Help”). Great performances but unfortunately besides that I didn’t really find paradise here.

The film follows a sheltered young woman (Julianne Hough) named Lamb Mannerheim, who loses her faith after a plane crash, leaves her small town of Blakesley, Montana and decides to go to Las Vegas to let loose and experience everything that she has missed in her life. On her journey, she meets a nightclub singer Loray (Octavia Spencer) and bartender William (Russell Brand) who end up taking her under their wing and assist her in finding herself.

I  love Julianne Hough in this film (or any film actually). I think she does a great job (and even manages to sing a little). Russell Brand gives a mature performance and is quite likable. He is funny yet very sweet at the same time. Octavia Spencer is just amazing and really has such a great presence. The film gets off to a rough start but surprising picks up some in the last 30 minutes, where it gets some heart. I am a sucker for anything to do with Las Vegas, especially since I have been dying to get back there. I would call this a one-timer, worth checking out for the cast performances but otherwise nothing too memorable here.

Film Review “Captain Phillips”

Starring: Tom Hanks, Barkhad Abdi
Directed By: Paul Greengrass
Rated: PG 13
Running time: 2 hours 14 mins
Sony Pictures

Our Score: 4.5 out of 5 stars

From the director of “The Bourne Supremacy” and “The Bourne Ulitmatum” and the writer of “Flight Plan” and “The Hunger Games”; Tom Hanks stars as “Captain Phillips,” the true story about an American captain and his crew being hijacked by Somali Pirates off the coast of Africa in 2009.

While carrying supplies and food for poverty stricken villages in Somalia and Kenya, The Maersk Alabama became the first American ship in 200 years to be hijacked by pirates. The story follows Captain Richard Phillips (Tom Hanks) and the pirate captain, Muse (Barkhad Abdi), from the hijacking of the Alabama to the capture of the pirates and escape of captain and crew. We are introduced to the world of the Somali pirates, their planning (or lack there of) and their successful taking over of ships with just a small row boat with a motor. Because the Alabama was a freight carrier with a tall hull, the thinking on board was that there was little to no chance of the ship being hijacked. Which means the crew is less than prepared for the struggles they endure and are rendered helpless when their captain and leader is taken hostage by four pirates in a small covered life boat.

This story was broadcast all over the news in 2009 and captivated much of America at the time. Here we see the story that wasn’t presented on the news; the communication between Phillips and the pirates; the struggle of isolation and not knowing. The film also takes you into the chase by the US Navy and the attempted rescues that take place.

In my opinion the film ran a little too long. If you’re familiar with the story and the outcome before watching the movie you’ll find yourself sitting there for the last 30 mins just waiting for the end. However, if you have no recollection of the incident, as surprisingly some people around me in the theatre weren’t, it is a suspenseful ride throughout. This film is about courage, trust, and determination and you see it at both sides of the spectrum. Tom Hanks is, well, Tom Hanks; you know he is going to deliver in any role he takes on. But it’s the crew of pirates that really make the film and truly build the story. First time actors Barkhad Abdi, Barkhad Abdrahman, Faysal Ambed, and Mahat Ali all deliver performances that are so genuine, intimidating and sometimes frightening, it made me wonder if they were actors or the real deal!

I wouldn’t say this is a must see in the theaters but this film IS a must see. I have no doubts that Hanks, Paul Greengrass and the film itself will be recognized during award season.

Film Review “Escape from Tomorrow”

Directed by: Randy Moore
Starring: Roy Abramsohn, Elena Schuber, Katelynn Rodriguez, Annet Mahendru, Danielle Safady and Alison Lees-Taylor
Distributed by: Producers Distribution Agency
MPAA Rating: Not Rated
Running Time: 90 minutes

Our Score: 2 out of 5 stars

Earlier this year a very unique film premiered at 2013 Sundance Film Festival called “Escape from Tomorrow”. The film made headlines immediately since it was filmed in Walt Disney World’s Magic Kingdom and Epcot as well as Disneyland completely under the radar without anyone knowing. Everyone believed that Disney would immediately bury the film and let their lawyers loose on the people behind it. Surprising, the film did not disappear into oblivion instead Disney took an similar approach like SeaWorld did with the documentary “Blackfish”, they have just ignored it. Well after watching “Escape from Tomorrow” finally, I wish I would have ignored it as well.

Living in Orlando, FL, I was very curious about “Escape from Tomorrow” especially since I visit Walt Disney World on a weekly basis. I found it fascinating that these people have pulled off filming an entire film without anyone from Disney catching on. The premise for the film does not represent your typical Disney theme either. It follows a middle-aged husband and father that learns that he has lost his job while on vacation in Walt Disney World. While trying to enjoy their last day on vacation, he sets out to the park with his nagging wife (who I wanted to strangle) and snotty kids. He starts to experience very strange visions and encounters, while heading down a path of madness.

The aspect of the film that I did enjoy was that fact that it was shot in black and white, I felt that it added a certain eerie feel. The acting is not very impressive and I wish Roy Abramsohn would have appeared shirtless much less than he did. This had a cool idea and could have had potential but it falls short of delivering anything entertaining. The story has too many holes and doesn’t deliver. I am also not sure if the film was cut heavily since it first premiered at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival because I have seen a 104 minute running time online but the version I saw was only 90 minutes. But honestly, though I do not think I would have been able to watch another 14 minutes added onto this film.

So nearly a year since its debut at Sundance, “Escape from Tomorrow” is now playing in select theaters across the country including the IFC Center in New York. Also like a lot of indie films recently, this is also available to watch VOD via iTunes, Amazon Instant Video, Vudu and many other formats. I will leave it to you to decided whether or not to watch this. Even though I didn’t enjoy the film, I would still strangely recommend it since it does have that certain curiosity about it. But when I think about it further, I just think about flat story and the many missed opportunities.

Film Review “Machete Kills”

Starring: Danny Trejo, Mel Gibson and introducing Carlos Estevez
Directed by: Robert Rodriguez
Rated: R
Running time: 1 hour 47 mins
Open Road

Our Score: 4 out of 5 stars

It’s well known that Machete Cortez don’t text. He also doesn’t tweet. Or smoke. But what he does do, better than anyone, is kick ass. And kill. Again.

While attempting to prevent an illegal sale of government weapons Machete (Trejo) is abducted and brought to the White House for a meeting with President Rathcock (Estevez – better known as the artist formerly known as Charlie Sheen). The president asks Machete to return to Mexico and find out where the weapons and drugs are entering our country. In return for his services Machete will find his criminal record erased and be made a U.S. Citizen. What could go wrong?

As someone that worked in the theatre business in the late 70s and early 80s many of my favorite memories involve working the all night weekend shows. Kung Fu. Horror. Sexploitation. We played them all. Some nights we would have 500 screaming patrons, hiding their eyes at the scary scenes, punching the backs of the seats in front of them during the fights and generally having a great time in the dark. “Machete Kills,” like the original “Machete” (and, for that matter, director Rodriguez’ and Quentin Tarantino’s “Grindhouse” double feature) pay homage to that great period of scratched prints, over the top bloodshed and women with machine-gun brassieres!

The story goes like this: once in Mexico Machete is instructed to visit Marcos Mendez (a hilarious turn by the Oscar-nominated Demian Bichir). Mendez has unfortunately developed a split personality. One moment he’s a strong willed crusader fighting for his people and the next a terrorist who has stolen a nuclear missile and pointed it towards Washington D.C. To ensure his plan won’t fail, he has had the trigger mechanism installed in his heart. If his heart stops, the missile fires. Machete also has to deal with a master-of-disguise hitman named the Chameleon and an industrial tycoon (Gibson, in fine form) with plans to fly his own space shuttle. Along the way there is enough action and blood to please even the most hardcore grindhouse fan.

As always, Rodriguez has peppered his cast with familiar faces, including “Modern Family” star Sofia Vergara as an over protective mother (and the owner of the aforementioned deadly bra), Amber Heard as Machete’s contact, whose cover is to constantly participate in Texas based beauty pageants and the quartet of Cuba Gooding, Jr, Walter Goggins, Lady Gaga and Antonio Banderas (a Rodriguez veteran) as the Chameleon. Also returning are “Machete” veterans Michelle Rodriguez and Tom Savini, whose first onscreen appearance drew cheers from the screening audience. Whether it’s because his Osiris was a memorable character in the first film or because he is one of the greatest make-up artists of all time, I don’t know. But either way it was applause well deserved. As Machete, Trejo is a straight faced, slow-burning time bomb. You can read his life story in the lines on his face.

Speaking of makeup, Greg Nicotero and his staff at KNB again outdo themselves in the gore department. Behind the camera Rodriguez moves the story along smoothly and Kyle Ward’s screenplay, based on a story by director Rodriguez and his brother, Marcel, keep the one liners coming.

If you’re looking for an in-depth, serious film I suggest you go see “Gravity.” But if you’re looking for a fun time in the dark, head to “Machete Kills.” And when it’s over get in line for “Machete Kills Again —In Space!”

 

Related Content

Film Review “Argento’s Dracula”

Starring Thomas Kretshmann, Marta Gastini, Asia Argento, Rutger Hauer
Directed by Dario Argento
IFC Midnight
MPAA Rating: Unrated
Running Time: 106 minutes

Our Score: 2.5 out of 5 stars

I remember very clearly the first time I dared to watch Dario Argento’s “Suspira”. My father told me that it was one of the scariest movie he has ever seen and at the time I thought so also. Since that day, I have been a fan of Argento’s films or I should say earlier not recent films. I was excited to find out that Argento was tackling the classic Bram Stoker adapation of “Dracula”. To make it even cooler it will be released in 3D (though my review copy was not 🙁 ). The film is rather unfocused and lacking the certain charm from Argento’s past films.

Official Premise: Horror master Dario Argento returns with a bloody, luridly creepy version of the classic vampire tale, drenched in gore and sex. An unsuspecting Englishman arrives in Transylvania, lured by a job with a local nobleman. But the undead Count Dracula’s real target is the man’s innocent young wife. Featuring the iconic Rutger Hauer as vampire hunter Van Helsing and the inimitable Asia Argento (the director’s own daughter) as a local all-too-eager to fall under the Count’s sway.

Of course the film co-star’s Argento’s (very easy on the eyes) daughter, Asia Argento but it always strikes me odd that she has to be nude in every film that she is in with her father. I am not complaining…but just a little strange. Rutger Hauer is decent playing Van Helsing but doesn’t show up till over half way through the film.  Thomas Kretshmann does play a pretty good job as Dracula also. He has the charm that is required for the role, yet also a darkside. The visual effects were split between pretty cool to over-the-top terrible like a giant praying matis (WTF!). In terms of gore though, there is plenty of blood spilled.

I would like to say that I was disappointed that I did not get a chance to see this film in 3D but I also honestly didn’t see a reason for the added dimension.  The sets were very tight and framed low, so there wouldn’t be much of added scale. There was also little in-your-face gags that required it either. So despite the lack of the 3D, overall it felt just a little too cheesy to be taken seriously. Not Argento’s best work but also not his worst and for those that have seen “The Mothers of Tears”, you know what I mean.

Film Review “Gravity”

Starring: Sandra Bullock and George Clooney
Directed by: Alfonso Cuaron
Rated: PG 13
Running time: 1 hour 30 mins
Warner Brothers

Our Score: 4 out of 5 stars

Silence.

Remember the poster for “Alien?” “In Space, No One Can Hear You Scream,” it proudly proclaimed. Very true. The world is silent. Unless you’re Dr. Ryan Stone (Bullock), who can’t help but here the incessant chatter of her companion on her space walk, veteran astronaut Matt Kowalski (Clooney). The two of them are floating hundreds of thousands of miles above the earth, tethered to a shuttle. While Stone works diligently on a project Kowalski zooms around her with his jet pack, filling her helmet with stories about his ex-wife and visiting the Mardi Gras. Things go well until the receive a message telling them that a Russian satellite has been destroyed and now the debris is heading towards them. Stone wants to scream. Too bad no one will hear her?

Amazingly filmed (the entire film takes place in zero gravity), “Gravity” is a technical masterpiece. It is quite possibly the greatest visual knockout since the first star destroyer flew over the audience in “Star Wars.” The story in a (space) capsule: when their shuttle is damaged by debris Stone and Kowalski must find their way through space in order to find a place safe to seek refuge. However not only is there no sound in space, there is no gravity and soon Stone finds herself floating aimlessly in the darkness with only the sound of her breathing in her ears.

The story can best be described as “Cast Away” in space. And like that Tom Hanks starrer, “Gravity” is pretty much a one person show. But there’s a lot more to see than just one person against the vacuum of space, including a stunning performance by Bullock. With only her training and the sometimes soothing voice of Mission Control (played, with a wink to fans of “Apollo 13,” by Ed Harris), Stone is literally the last person in the world. Bullock manages to capture all of the emotions necessary and project them on to the audience. It’s a performance of sheer brilliance which should bring her Academy Award nomination number two!

On the other side of the spectrum, things in space can get very monotonous. Traveling from one shelter to another or quickly taking a crash course to maneuver repeatedly can make ninety minutes seem much longer. Even the outstanding special effects (as she cries to herself Stone’s tears literally “fall” off of her face and float softly around her) can’t keep the film continuingly moving. It is a credit to director Cuaron that the audience puts themselves in Bullock’s place, if even for a moment. Script-wise there are a few holes, including how someone with such a short training period can learn to not only read but understand Russian technology, but the more you give yourself to the visual aspect of the film the better off you’ll enjoy it.

New York Film Festival Review “Exhibition”

Starring: Viv Albertine, Liam Gillick, Tom Hiddleston, Mary Roscoe
Directed By: Joanna Hogg
New York FIlm Festival
Running Time: 110 minutes

Our Score: 4 out of 5 stars

Set in London, “Exhibition” focuses on a middle-aged married couple, known only in the film as D (Albertine) and H (Gillick). Both artists living a spectacular modernist house, itself built by an artist, we join them at the critical moment of their decision to sell the place. D is hesitant to make the move from a home that has defined their lives for nearly two decades.

It’s surprising to learn that the two leads of the film were themselves not actors. Albertine, the guitarist for band The Slits and Gillick, who is actually a conceptual artist himself, have an amazing chemistry as a long married couple. Though much of the film finds them in a state of disconnect–they communicate with each other through a very clinical intercom system in the house–we get these small moments of levity that make their relationship feel very lived in despite their tensions. You feel a sort of united front the couple present when they are engaging with painfully chatty outsiders like their neighbor going on and on about her children or the constantly upbeat realtor attempting to reassure D they’ll find good buyers (Hogg’s former film alums Mary Roscoe and Tom Hiddleston, respectively). Albertine has most of the screentime and she goes a long way in selling her attachment to both her home and her husband through her heartfelt pleas for H not to go wandering the city at night and later her running outside to confirm the ambulance down the block has nothing to do with H. Her anxiety about a prior ‘incident’ she doesn’t wish to repeat is never fully explained in the film but the desperation you sense when D alludes to it is enough to explain her unease.

I was fortunate to see this film, Hogg’s third feature, as part of a series showcasing all her work at this week’s New York Film Festival. Her first two features, Unrelated and Archipelago, established Hogg’s tremendous control over and emphasis on setting. Though Unrelated and Archipelago took place on family holidays and Exhibition is confined to the house, the sense of place feels like an additional character in her stories. Aesthetically beautiful as they are, they can also turn alienating at a moment’s notice. “Exhibition” takes this a step further through Jovan Ajder’s amazing sound design that morphs the home from a shelter from the sirens outside, to an oversize cavern with all it’s metallic creaking and huge sliding doors that dwarf D when she is on her own. Though D professes to a friend over Skype to be able to feel the love of the previous owners of the house in the walls, the audience may need some convincing. Hogg’s sound design coupled with her meticulous visuals bring us into the growing anxiety that D feels.

“Exhibition” is screening as part of the 51st New York Film Festival taking place through October 12th in Lincoln Center. For more information on it’s remaining screening, visit FilmLinc.com

 

Related Content

Film Review “Don Jon”

Starring: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Scarlett Johansson, Julianne Moore
Directed by: Joseph Gordon-Levitt
Rated: R
Running time: 1 hour 30 mins
Relativity Media

Our Score: 4 out of 5 stars

Don Jon” is the story of a man in New Jersey who cares and believes solely and whole heartedly in his body, his bachelor pad, family, God, girls and porn. And not in any particular order because, if so, porn would be in between every thing he loves. Don Jon (Gordon-Levitt) is a bartender that loves the night life, and there isn’t a night that he goes out that he returns home alone. He has no problems getting girls and they are always an 8 or better. So what’s the problem? He loves porn! He watches it any time he has a spare moment. For this reason any encounter he has is never like the clips and videos he watches. He is always left feeling unfulfilled, disappointed, still looking for that great sex!

Enter Barbara Sugarman (Johansson) She’s a “dime” — a straight up 10. Jon is in love at first sight and unlike every other girl in New Jersey she makes him work for it. No first night hook up, no one dinner date hookup. It’s meet the families, meet the friends, spend quality time. He is in love and he’s sure nothing could ruin this feeling…she’s the girl he’s been looking for to change him. But, just like every other girl, she isn’t a pornstar or anyone that gets paid for sex. He realizes this after their first encounter. Back to the porn he goes only to have Barbara catch him in the act. Heart broken and realizing the overall problem he actually has, he finds help directly and indirectly from the people around him, including his parents, played by Tony Danza and Glenne Headly, and an older woman in Jon’s class played by Julianne Moore.

This film is a very impressive writing and directing debut by Joseph Gordon-Levitt. He captured a lifestyle of men that is becoming somewhat of a common problem in America and across the world. With easy access to the internet men are just a click away from beautiful, sexy, easy women. This gives men delusions of how woman act and that you can still find that one girl that will do anything but you can take home to your parents and, more importantly, to church. He details this struggle very well which makes me wonder…how much of this story is fact and how much is fiction.

The film not only shows the struggle of an addict and his consequences, it follows his story to the end. Deceit in a relationship comes with consequences. With consequences a great lesson is generally learned. Though you may have lost that love you had the lessons learned are much more important. You love and lose but you will love again.

“Don Jon” is well written with a great cast. It’s a great love story with numerous short, one second porn clips. In other words, it’s a love story that men will enjoy. Gordon-Levitt does a fine job on both sides of the camera and I will make sure to catch the next movie he decides to put his talents to.

 

Related Content

Film Review “Rush”

Starring: Chris Hemsworth and Daniel Bruhl
Directed by: Ron Howard
Rated: R
Running time: 2 hours 3 mins
Universal

Our Score: 5 out of 5 stars

When I was growing up in the 1970s there was no ESPN. There was one baseball game shown on television on Saturday afternoon and “Monday Night Football” was just beginning. If you enjoyed sports your show of shows was ABC’s “Wide World of Sports.” From cliff divers to the Harlem Globetrotters and everything in between, WWoS was the place to be. Among the events broadcast was Formula One racing. Think of it as NASCAR in a smaller, less safer car. In 1976 the World Championships of Formula One racing came down to two drivers: James Hunt of England and Austria’s Niki Lauda. Both paid a price in their hunt for the top prize, a price detailed brilliantly in Ron Howard’s latest film, “Rush.”

James Hunt (Hemsworth) seemingly has it all. Good looks. A way with the ladies. And the ability to drive a car faster then almost anyone else in the world. From early days in the minor leagues of racing he has worked his way into the echelon of Formula One racing. Niki Lauda (Bruhl) can also maneuver a car around a track with seeming ease. But instead of embracing all that racing has offered he keeps to himself, constantly working to become the best he can be. On August 1, 1976 at the Nurburgring Grand Prix in Germany, both men’s lives changed in an instant. Those changes, and the events that lead up to them, are the story of “Rush.”

It’s ironic that Ron Howard’s first film as a director, 1977’s “Grand Theft Auto,” dealt with cars going very fast and crashing. His latest film is yet another jewel in the crowns of one of the finest filmmakers of the past quarter century. In his second pairing with screenwriter Peter Morgan (the two earned much deserved Oscar nominations for their first venture, “Frost/Nixon”), Howard has managed to take the audience inside the world of Formula One racing, putting them directly into the cockpit and enabling them to experience the thrill and the danger from their seats. Morgan’s script is solidly written, especially when it deals with the inner workings of the main characters. Hunt is the typical 70s athlete…confident to the point of being smug. Lauda is the same, only where Hunt’s attitude is looked at as bravado Lauda comes across as arrogant. They both find themselves supported by significant others, again in similar yet different fashion. While Suzy (Olivia Wilde) eventually learns that the only love in Hunt’s life is racing, Marlene (Alexandra Maria Lara) learns to accept her place in her husband’s life and her support is vital. Sadly, both female leads don’t have much to do, often as much in the background as the fans in the stands. A sub-plot showing Suzy Hunt dating Richard Burton (they would eventually marry after, rumor has it, Burton paid James Hunt $1 million to hasten the divorce) seems to be shoehorned into the film at the last minute.

Both leads are outstanding. If you only know Hemsworth from his work as Thor in the various Marvel Universe films, prepared to be impressed. He captures perfectly Hunt’s swagger yet still manages to portray the vulnerability Hunt felt in his lonelier moments. Bruhl is just as captivating. Probably best known to movie goers for his portrayal of Private Frederik Zoller in “Inglorious Basterds,” Bruhl is sure to make the short list in the Best Supporting Actor category come Oscar time. And keep a spot reserved for Howard as well. His cameras not only take you to the races, they put you in the middle of them. You can practically feel the wind in your face as the camera takes you around the track at 200 miles per hour. Simply put, “Rush” is a rush!

Copyright: MediaMikes.com © 2013 · Powered by: nGeneYes, Inc. · Login

All logos and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies. All Rights Reserved. Some of the content presented on our sites has been provided by contributors, other unofficial websites or online news sources, and is the sole responsibility of the source from which it was obtained. MediaMikes.com is not liable for inaccuracies, errors, or omissions found herein. For removal of copyrighted images, trademarks, or other issues, Contact Us.