Interview with Gabrielle Wortman

With training in blues guitar, classical piano, and gospel singing, Gabrielle Wortman’s extensive musical education is nothing short of a unique combination. This unique combination, however, has earned her a 2009 Los Angeles Music Award nomination for her debut album, provided her with thousands of fans across the country, and allows her to continue recording and performing. Described as “haunting and captivating”, Gabrielle Wortman is one that “stands out in the LA music scene.”  Media Mikes had a chance to chat with Gabrielle about her music and her upcoming third album.

Mike Gencarelli: How you always wanted to pursue a career in music?
Gabrielle Wortman: Actually I have been always pressing a career in music.  I have been a classically trained pianist from the age of kindergarten.  If it wasn’t song writing, it was classical piano.  There was some gospel singing in there and some blues guitar as well.  I have a heavy background in musical education.  It wasn’t until middle school and high school that I really started writing songs.  I found that my own music and song writing career was really where my passion lied.

MG: What is your process when you sit down to write a song?
GW: Usually, the best songs are born in five minutes.  I kind of hear music in my head all the time.  For example, right now as we speak there is a construction site behind my apartment and when I hear the jack hammer, I can start to hear a beat.  I either have the emotion already or I have the melody and then I try to make the other sound like what you already have.  If I want to write a song about heartbreak then I want my piano to sound like its heart is breaking.  You try and keep everything really pure and in the same veins so it is a coherent song.

MG: What is your main inspiration for your music? Favorite artists?
GW: I really have an eclectic taste in music and combined with my music background is what creates my sound.  It is like an original fusion of different genres.  I have been really influenced by my classical piano background.  There is elements of Tori Amos in the way I play the piano.  Then I was also influenced by gospel singing and that shows in my vocal training.  All of my voice lines are very soulful and sensual and they have that southern kind of blues feel.  Then I grew up addicted to Radiohead and I love the way they do their drum tracks.  I have been very experimental with percussion.  I think the fusion with those three types of genres is really where I get my sound from.

MG: Tell us about your latest EP, “The Voodoo”?
I wrote it inspired by New Orleans.  It is so hard not to walk down the streets of New Orleans and soak up the flavor and the music.  It feels so haunted and heavy.  I wanted to release a two song EP, so that my fans could see the direction that my style was going in.  That is really what drew the two songs that I did.  The rest of my next album is going to be in the same vein.  The Voodoo EP kind of ended up being like a sneak peek on what is to come.

MG: Did you enjoy doing the music video for “Don’t Let Me Lose Control”?
GW: Oh my God, yes!  I did it with a really good friend of mine, who is also a great filmmaker.  I told him I had a deadline and needed to make a music video.  I think he saw it as a very pretty music video and we would go in the singer/songwriter vein where the girl looks really beautiful.  I told him “No, no, no”.  I wanted to it be kind of creepy and dark.  The whole song is about the dark side of love.  Everybody always writes about the happy side of falling in love.  There is a darker side, it is called angst, worry and unrequitedness.  I wanted that tension captured in the video too.  So we actually broke into an abandon insane asylum out here in LA.  There was no way for that music video shoot to be less glamorous.  I had glass embedded in my feet for a week after we shot that thing [laughs].  Honestly, it was so much fun and we pushed all of the limits.  It was a visual masterpiece.

MG: What do you like most about signing to a crowd?
GW: I actually just had a debate with my friend who is a musician.  For me playing live is literally the most important thing about my music career.  I can write a song, record it and put it on a album and sell it to a fan.  That fan is going to take that song, listen to it and experience by themselves.  But when I can play in front of a crowd.   I am actually experiencing my songs with my fans.  That is why I think it is such a precious bond between the artist and their fans.   That is the most powerful way to connect to somebody through music.  Honestly it is what I live for and it is definitely my favorite part of being a musician.  I have pretty have high standards for our live shows.  We are perfectionists and we rehearse and work so hard to deliver a good live show.  I think that live shows tend to get neglected nowadays but it should because it is the most important part in anyone’s music career.

MG: What can we expect might? Are you working on a full album?
GW: Yes actually all of the song for the next album are completely done.  We just need to record them.  So expect a new album in the next six months, I would say.  We are really excited about the new material, it is the best I have ever written.  We have been hearing some wonderful things about it.  So, expect a tour in the next year and then the new album in the next six months.

Interview with Mike Wolfe

Mike Wolfe is one of the guys behind the hit show on The History Channel, “American Pickers”, along with Frank Fritz. They travel around the United States buying antiques and collectibles or as they call it “picking”. The show is a huge hit and is already well into its third season. Movie Mikes had a chance to grab Mike to answer a few questions about this hit show.

Mike Gencarelli: What made originally think that a show about going through “junk”, so to say, would be something people would watch?
Mike Wolfe: I’d come across these people with incredible stories and their connection with their pieces and I’d come home with all these stories and my friends would tell me you really need to start documenting some of this stuff. So, I started filming myself – traveling around and digging in barns – and when Frank I would travel together we would film each other. It was that footage that we used to pitch a television show. I think people enjoy the celebration of collecting, and the unsung people and their stories that you see in the show. It’s a show about modern day treasure hunting…

MG: Tell us about this upcoming season and what can we expect?
MW: Frank and I will continue to travel around America picking and meeting new and interesting people. We are thinking of hitting up New Hampshire and Vermont soon. I’m pretty sure we will have driven 100,000+ miles picking by the years end.

MG: How can you reflect on the success of the show with more than 5 million viewers?
MW: We never expected the show to be such a huge success. I pitched the concept of the show for years and got turned down because producers would say that no one will ever watch a show about antiques.

MG: On the show you always showcase the items picked and how much you will sell them for versus paid… but they always show an estimated profit, can you think of something in particular you’ve picked over the years that for any unexpected reason didn’t sell nearly near your expectation – and how come?
MW: The collectors market and what people look to buy is driven by trends and the likes of Pier 1 Imports and stores that produce a mass appeal. There hasn’t been an item I’ve ever really regretted buying. There have been items I’ve fallen in love with and definitely paid too much for and barely made a profit from though.

MG: You must keep some items you pick, what is your most prized possession in your collection?
MW: I picked a 1913 Harley in a dusty old barn in upstate New York …and now it’s in my living room back in Iowa as a decorative piece.

MG: What’s one thing you’ve never been able to pick that you’ve wanted most and why?
MW: The “holy grail” of picks would be… a pre-1915 Blackhawk or Hornecker Torpedo motorcycle. If you have one, let me know!

MG: What would you say is the strangest thing you’ve every picked and turned a profit on?
MW: I don’t really have a story I can think of off-hand for this question as a lot of items I buy are for decorative means – so they can be strange to some and normal to others… but how about a story about the strangest item a fan asked me to autograph recently? … Dashboard of car … a guy that picks all the time asked me to sign in his car because he is always in it and considers Frank and me his picker inspiration.

MG: You are going to be expanding Antique Archaeology this year, how can you find the time? What else do you have planned?
MW: We’ve already expanded. Opened the Nashville Antique Archaeology in July 2011. And, the store is doing really well already. Planning to launch a special website for kids soon and we have the “American Pickers Guide to Picking” book coming out in mid-September.

 

Related Content

Interview with Larry Kenney

Larry Kenney is known best for his role voicing Lion-O in the original “Thundercats” series.  Larry is also the voice of Count Chocula and Sonny, the Coco Puffs bird.  Larry is returing to “Thundercats” on July 29th for its reboot playing the character King Claudus, Lion-O’s father.  Movie Mikes had a chance to chat with Larry about his voice work and what we can expect from the new “Thundercats” series.

Mike Gencarelli:  How did you get involved with “Thundercats?”
Larry Kenney:  Well, I’m a voice over actor and, like every other job you get in this business, you get a call from your agent.  I got a call from mine back in 1983.  He told me that, “tomorrow, at such and such a time you’ll go to such and such address and ask for this person.”  It was for a new cartoon series called “Thundercats” and I went in to audition.  When I got there all of the walls in the studio were covered with pictures of the characters.  They handed me a synopsis of what the series was about and also a brief synopsis of each character.  They said to pick a few characters you’d like to read for.  So I picked Lion-O and I also picked Jackalman and a couple others.  In voice acting it’s first come, first served so I waited until they called me in.  When they did they asked me what I thought Lion-O might sound like.  They gave me a little information…what his characteristics were.  And then you do what you do.  Whether it’s for a cartoon series or for Dawn detergent.  You do the audition and you leave.  When you’ve been doing this as long as I have you don’t sit around the house thinking, “gee, I hope I get it…I hope I get it.”  But you DO hope you get it. (laughs)  And then you either get a call from your agent in the next couple of days saying “you booked it” or you never get a call.  Fortunately I got the call.  And a couple of months later we started recording.

MG:  How was it working for the legendary Rankin/Bass team?
LK:  That was the first thing that struck me.  I didn’t know it was for Rankin/Bass until I got to the audition and saw the Rankin/Bass logo on the script.  I’m 63 years old and I grew up watching “Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer” with Burl Ives and  Fred Astaire in “Santa Claus is Coming to Town” and “Frosty the Snowman.”  They were classics.  At the time there were no animated shows being done in New York City.  Everything was being done out in California because of Disney and Warner Brothers.  In fact another one of my first thoughts was “wow, why are they doing it in New York?”  Then when I got the job I was glad they were doing it in New York.  (laughs)

MG:  What is your inspiration in creating the different characters?
LK:  Well, they wanted Lion-O to not be so “charactery.”  But they always wanted them to have a hint of animal (he speaks in Lion-O’s raspy voice)…of course he doesn’t sound like a lion.  My first thought…he was young when he started.  He was naive’ and kind of cocky.  So I went with a lot of vulnerability with him, but still authoritative.  I didn’t want him to come off like he knew everything, though he thought he did.  I mean the voice is really the same voice I’m using to talk with you.  Of course it’s a little more dramatic because it’s a television show.  But if I was just sitting here talking to you I’d say, “the sword of Omens come into my hand…I, Lion-O, command it.”   But on tv it’s (much more dramatic) “Sword of Omens…come into my hand!   I, Lion-O, command it!”  Interestingly enough I’m playing Lion-O’s father in the new series.

MG:  What can you tell us about that?  It’s right around the bend.
LK:  I know.  July 29th.  For King Claudus it’s really just Lion-O’s voice but older.

MG:  Was it a thrill returning to the series?
LK:  Being on an animated series is a great thrill for an actor.  You’re playing fantasy figures.  And every actor wants to play a villain.  Every screen actor wants to be in “Batman” and play the Joker.  It gives you the chance to really stretch…to be wild and crazy with the character.  First of all just doing an animated series is a lot of fun.  But what made it even greater is that it’s”Thundercats”…it’s SilverHawks and TigerSharks and Karate Kat.  And it’s the same cast…all the people I worked with.  We became a real close family over the years we worked together on the different series and they were a blast to work with.

MG:  “Thundercats” ran for 130 episodes.  How did you manage to keep the characters fresh?
LK:  It was easy for the actors because we only worked two days a month, two shows each time we worked.  We’d work a Thursday and a Friday in the middle of each month.  We’d only do four shows a month.  Now when the show was first sold we worked five days a week.  But once the show was on the air…after the first thirteen or twenty episodes, we actually had to take a break to allow the writers to come up with the scripts.  Because they sure hadn’t written 130 episodes at the beginning, only the initial thirteen or twenty six.  Once they sold those shows and we knew they wanted more..they needed the time to write the scripts.

MG:  You’re also the voice of Count Chocula and Sonny, the Coco Puffs bird.  How did those roles come about?
LK:  The exact same way.  I’ve been doing both of them for over 40 years.  Both of them have been long standing characters.  I grew up myself watching CoCo Puffs commercials.  It was exciting getting those jobs because they were something I watched when I was growing up.  In those two cases, though, they had established voices and they told each actor that they wanted us to come as close to the original voice as possible, because the kids were used to them.

MG:  What are your feelings on the possible new live action “Thundercats?”
LK:  Warner Brothers had announced a few years ago that they were going to do a movie.  Live with CGI. They hired a director and screenwriter, but they later decided to do another series. Who knows, if the series if a hit, and I think it will be, they’ll do a movie too!

John Pinette talks about latest special “Still Hungry”

John Pinette is one of the funniest comedians in the business.  He is most well known for this Chinese Buffett bit.  His first Comedy Central special was titled “I’m Starving” and his follow-up which premiers on July 29th, 2011 is titled “Still Hungry”.  Movie Mikes had a chance to joke around with John and also chat about his new special.

Mike Gencarelli: Tell us about your latest special/DVD “Still Hungry”?
John Pinette: The first special was “I’m Starvin'”…so “Still Hungry”, seemed like an appropriate name.  It is appropriate though in two ways, one obviously being a sequel but the other it is a double entendre.  I have been on the road 25 years.  I like performing more than ever…and am I still hungry to get on the stage and make people laugh? Yeah more than ever!  I like to say that I have set higher standards for myself that I did when I was a young kid and didn’t really know how to do this.  I learned by error and it is a tough road to learn.  You build over the 25 years, you are either going to love it more or you fade.  I feel like I love it more, so I definitely feel like I am still hungry.

MG: Tell us about the bits we can expect in this special?
JP: Oh yes, it has evolved.  It has evolved as my life has evolved.  It is not the comedy it was 5…10…15 years ago.  It is current. It progresses pretty naturally.  In 1998, I did “Show Me The Buffett” CD and it did well but everyone said “Well, he talks about food all the time”.  Well now I am watching “Man vs. Food”, this guy is eating a steak and cheese sandwich like size of an actual WWII submarine.  They are complaining about me?  All I did was mention that I happened to like a buffet or two.  There is the Food Network and they have food competitions….in Japan, they have the Iron Chef, if you don’t win they kill you [laughs].  There is food now all over the place.  You know you got a lot of food shows when you got me saying “Enough with the food, isn’t there an exercise show on” [laughs].  I do not mind poking fun at myself but I think done in pretty good taste and also all in good fun for this show.

MG: The only way I am watching this special is if it’s in 3D [laughs].
JP: Listen when we get me in 3D, that’s going to be something else.  Imagine me reaching through the screen and offering you a rib and then not letting go and pulling you through the screen [laughs].

MG: Being a comedian, you always are exposed to many funny jokes…do you adapt jokes that you hear to your sets?
JP: Definitely get aspects from Buddy Hackett, as a storyteller.  I think Billy Cosby is also a great storyteller.  There are a lot of comics that express angry like I do.  I once toured with Howie Mandel a long time ago.  He is a real practical joker and he really pissed me off a bunch of times.  He is a really nice guy but he likes his practical jokes.  Well it is 3am and I want to go to sleep.  He told me you need to be angry more on stage because it is really funny when you are angry.  I told him “No no no, I am really fucking angry…I am going to throw you through that window” [laughs].  But he has OCD, so you only have to cough on him to get him back.

MG: What do you like most about getting on stage? You ever get nervous?
JP: I get nervous before man.  I get tense sometimes.  I try not to think too much about the show until I start it.  Everyone has self doubt…but it also keeps you sharper if you use it the right way.

MG: Acting in Broadway shows, like “Hairspray”, how do you feel it differs from stand-up?
JP: I think one borrows from the other.  I think doing Broadway makes you stronger as a stand-up and stand-up gives you some tools to do Broadway, as far as being in front of an audience.  Singing and dancing was like climbing Mt. Everest, but as far as my relationship with the audience, that was pretty natural.  It was the hardest thing I have ever done but also one of the best things I have ever done.  At that stage in my life I didn’t think I could learn something like that all over again.

MG: How was it working with Frank Sinatra in the early days?
JP: He thought I was (Jackie) Gleason and I didn’t tell him different.  [laughs]  We got along very well.  There was a number of comics that got to work with him and I was lucky enough to be one of them.  I was walking around on a cloud.  It just blew my mind.  I was 29 years old and it did open a lot of doors for me.  In Vegas, unlike now there was a different headliner for every show and every headliners had opening comics.  It was great.  I did one of the last shows at the Desert Inn.  It is funny I started at Vegas in 1988, at the old Comedy Store in the Dunes.  They blew up the Dunes.  I headlined at the Sands…they blew that up.  Sahara…that got blown up.  They may be tacking dynamite around my place right now as we speak [laughs].

MG: Are you currently touring and if so where?
JP: We are doing a theater tour around October/November.  We will hit theaters throughout the east coast, midwest etc.  We will still be doing the clubs also though…just less.  I have had the same manager for 20 years and we have come to a point where we are a little bit better in booking more strategically.  So you’ll definitely be hearing from us.

 

Related Content

Interview with Mason Gamble

Mason Gamble started his film career in 1993 with the film “Dennis The Menace”. Mason’s latest film “Golf in the Kingdom” really shows his acting ability in the role of Michael Murphy. The film is adapted from the book of the same name. He co-stars in the film with the fantastic David O’Hara, who also gives a great performance. Movie Mikes had a chance to chat with Mason about the film and his career.

Mike Gencarelli: Tell us about your role of Michael Murphy in “Golf in the Kingdom”?
Mason Gamble: It is about a young guy at a specific point in his life and he has these expectations for where he is heading and exactly the path he needs to be on to get there. He then has a 24 hour period that completely 180’s he ideas on that. It takes him everywhere he thinks he needs to be going and makes him realize that he is focused on the wrong things. I think a lot of young people are often at that transition in their lives. I know I was at my transition in my life not to long ago. It was a role that seemed pretty appropriate with the timing of it.

Mike G: At what point did you read the book “Golf in the Kingdom”?
Mason G: First time I read the book was after I heard of the project. It was one of my agent’s favorite books growing up as a kid. He was excited when the project came along and that made me look into it a little bit closer. The ideas in the book and the way they can be taken to the game of golf really worked on me. I think it changed not only the way I approach my golf game but life in general.

Mike G: In general, are you a fan of the game of golf?
Mason G: I had gone a golf movie called “A Gentleman’s Game”, when I was 14. They taught me how to play for that a little bit, but I never really got into it. I didn’t have a lot of people I knew that played. After reading the book, then I started to play with a friend of mine. Some of the ideas in the book really changed the way I approached the game and it hit me hard. Since the audition process for the film, I have been a pretty avid golfer.

Mike G: How was it working with David O’Hara?
Mason G: Oh man, David is amazing. Not only did he disembody the role of Shivas Irons, but the focus and the power that he is able to control on the screen…he really draws you in when he is in the same frame as you. The stillness that he can perform a scene with is really overwhelming. He is a heck of an actor and very professional. It was a really small crew and we were three hours from anything where we shot. So having David up there for support and to lean on was great. We got really close and had a fantastic time together.

Mike G: Tell us about the production, where was it filmed?
Mason G: It was shot at an incredible place called Bandon Dune, which is just up the Oregon coast. It is a world class golf resort. I think at the time they only had 3 1/2 courses and building their 4th. The courses are in the top 25 courses in the national. We got to use all four of these courses to build our set for this movie. It just looks incredible and it is one of the most beautiful places to be working for two and half months.

Mike G: Tell us about working with director, Susan Streitfeld?
Mason G: It was fantastic. She has this amazing artistic vision. She has the ability to see things through the camera and on the screen that most people can’t see. When you work with her you really need to have a lot of trust in her. She had this vision for what was going to come out at the finish of this film. I think when you see it on screen it just looks great. The visuals…the scenery…the framing…it all just turned out so beautifully. I think so much of that credit needs to go to Susan. I think she had an eye for that the whole time.

Mike G: What do you have planned upcoming?
Mason G: Right now, I got about two quarters left of school. I am trying to graduate. I am majoring in Marine Biology. My love will always be acting, to me it is a job unlike any other job. The studying of Marine Biology and the continuing of education is something I have always been very passionate about. Developing your mind and your ability to think critically is really important. As an actor your mind is one of your most important tools. The more prospective you can bring to the table, I think the more range and variety you are going to be able to bring to your roles.

 

Related Content

Interview wtih Eamon Pirruccello

Eamon Pirruccello is going to be lending his voice to the 2011 reboot of “Thundercats”, which airs on Cartoon Network on July 29, 2011. Eamon is voicing the character of WilyKat in the new series. Movie Mikes had a chance to briefly ask Eamon about his experience working on the new “Thundercats” series in his very first interview.

Mike Gencarelli: Are you excited to be playing WilyKat in the reboot of “Thundercats”?
Eamon Pirruccello: Heck Yeah!  The shows have been really fun to record and the people I’ve met have been really fun!

MG: How did you prepare for the role? Did you watch any of the original “Thundercats” series to get inspiration?
EP: I prepared for it by getting focused before recording a line.  I actually haven’t seen the original show.  I probably will now that I have seen how awesome the new one is.

MG: How many episodes have you recorded so far?
EP: I don’t know actually, because I have not kept count.  I heard that the seasons are 26 episodes though.

MG: When you are recording the voice what visuals do you have? Storyboards? Full episodes?
EP: Normally none but sometimes we record ADR after the rest of the episode, at which point we are all recording to picture.

MG: How did you become involved with the short “Kung Fu Panda Secrets of the Furious Five”?
EP: It started like any other job: With an audition.  When I got the job, I was really excited that I would be a part of something like Kung-Fu Panda (Which now has two great movies and a short.)

 

Related Content

Interview with Colin Cunningham

Colin Cunningham is currently co-starring in TNT hit show “Falling Skies”, which is currently airing on Sunday nights on TNT. Movie Mikes had a chance to chat with Colin about working on the show and the upcoming episodes this season.

Mike Gencarelli: Congratulations on the show being picked up for second season, any reaction to that?
Colin Cunningham: Yes, I’m incredibly grateful. Yes, here’s my reaction to being picked up. I’m still trying to get over the fact that I even shot the first season…that I even got the audition…let alone got the part…let alone actually got on set and shot a scene that didn’t end up on the editing room floor. I’m still trying to just sink all that in, you know? I mean, I’m working on a Spielberg project with TNT and DreamWorks, and I’m still trying to get over that. So when all that sinks in, I’ll start thinking about the fact that we’ve been picked up and do it again [laughs].

Q: Tell us about working with  Noah Wyle, there is great animosity between you two.
A: I’ll tell you, Noah’s amazing. When we shot all that dialogue with Noah Wyle’s character, the entire motivation was to get me talking and to keep me talking so he can pull a gun and essentially kill me, you know? Noah’s an amazing actor. He really is. I was very grateful for the help that he gave me and he’s just a consummate professional. He’s such a great actor. We worked on those scenes, I’d ask him for some ideas – or – what do you think of this? And what do you think of that? He was always very, very generous.He’s incredible to work with, and he really raises the bar on the show. He just inspires everybody else to be just even better.

Q: What’s the hardest part of filming for you?
A: Hardest part of this particular show is – because it’s television, you’re lucky to get one take. I mean, that’s it. You get one crack at it, because you’ve got to move. Especially with this show, there’s so much money involved that you may have 200 extras in the background, and they’ve all got weapons and wardrobe and make-up. And there’s cars moving and things are being coordinated and motorcycles. This is all in the background, and all you and I have is a couple of lines going back and forth. Well, that may take 12 hours to set up, and if you screw up your lines, they’ve got to redo 200 people and re-mark everybody, bring the trucks back around. So there can be tremendous pressure.

Q: Well, why do you think people tune in to watch “Falling Skies” then?
A: Well, hopefully because it doesn’t suck, you know? [laughs] Hopefully because it’s good. I think there’s two reasons. Number one, it is epic. It’s huge. It’s a big, giant show. I mean, it’s not two people sitting on a couch sitcom kind of thing or it doesn’t take place at the cop shop, at the police headquarters, and it’s a gigantic stage. The other reason is the small part of it, and that is the characters, just the people themselves. I don’t think people are tuning in to see the aliens. They tune in to experience the stories and to get to know the characters, and then the aliens and all that other stuff is a perk. Well, that’s why I’d tune in, anyway. I think it’s a wonderful show.

Q: So I’m wondering if you had any bad guy role models that you kind of tried to slip in a little of them into John Pope?
A: Well, yes a person comes to mind, actually, it wasn’t so much bad guy, but I thought this guy has – it’s a word you don’t often hear all that much anymore – at the least character to me – was charisma. There’s something charismatic about him. It’s not a word that’s often attributed to too many actors out there, except for one that I know of is Peter Falk, God rest his soul. I’m a big Cassavetes fan and Peter had charisma. There was just something about the swagger, the – just his vibe, you know, because it’s not an easily definable aspect. So that was important to me, because bad guy, schmad guy, you know? Any smart actor naturally isn’t going to play him as a bad guy. The writers have already done that, so for me, it was about trying to find something different about him. What is he? He’s kind of part Shakespeare’s, and on the other side, Rector Howe. But overall it was about trying to find something that was different and so much of that was already in the writing. He’s so intelligent. He’s so smart. He’s articulate. He’s an opportunist. He’s incredibly selfish. I think in another lifetime, I can almost see John Pope and Tom Mason being best friends in school, in elementary school, and then, because of different choices in life, they ended up taking different paths.

Q: I’m also curious about John Pope’s relationship with Margaret. Clearly, they’ve had a rough patch, and she did kill John Pope’s brother. Are we going to see any sort of more tension, maybe even worse, in the episodes to come?
A: I really hope so. I was waiting for it and hoping for it, but there finally was a scene – because basically throughout the entire season, those two never really talk. I thought, wow, are they ever going to do something with this? And finally, I think it may be the last episode where we do have a scene. So I know that the writers don’t forget. I would love to explore that relationship. Sarah Carter is amazing in the role. I mean, was John Pope a part of the nastiness before because it was never entirely clear? It is interesting, because so much is not said. I would say absolutely not. I think if Pope had been there when that bit of nastiness was going on, it would have stopped. It would have ended. I think that that was something he does and he wouldn’t be a part of. That said, I do believe that he knew about it or found out about it and chose to do nothing, because you’re in a war situation, and still there’s still strength in numbers, and it’s unfortunate that you’ve got to fill your numbers with basically people who are garbage for the sake of being able to fight these aliens. War creates strange bedfellows, you know?

Q: Tell us about your other shows that you currently have on your plate?
A: I’ve got a couple of them. Right now, I’m also a lead on a TV show on HBO Canada called “Living in Your Car”. I’m also recurring on CBS’s “Flashpoint.” I play Hugh Dillon’s brother. Then also, I did another TNT pilot this year called “Perception” with Eric McCormack, so it’s been a really busy year for me. It’s been wonderful. In fact, if anything, when I was shooting “Falling Skies,” I was shooting my other show on the weekends, and I was working seven days a week. It was really intense.

 

Related Content

Interview with J. Teddy Garces

J. Teddy Garces is best known for his portrayal of Bruiser in the web series “The Guild” and Julian in “Ted Sampon: Househusband”. Movie Mikes had a chance to chat with J. Teddy about his roles and what he has planned next.

Mike Gencarelli: How did you meet Felicia Day and end up working on “The Guild” as Bruiser?
JTG: “The Guild” was a great experience from beginning to end. I received a call from my agent about an audition for a series that was pretty popular on the web. I read the audition material and researched the show. I loved it. When I went in to read for the role of Bruiser, Felicia was there with Sean (the director) and Kim (the Producer). Jenni Powell was also there, she was the one I read with. They all generated such great energy during the audition that it became very easy to feel comfortable. I remember there was a lot of laughter from everyone in the room and the next day I received a call that I had gotten the part.

MG: What can we expect from season five of the show?
JTG: To be honest I don’t really know what season five holds in store. The show changes from season to season and with Felicia, although you know its going to be great, you still don’t know what to expect.

MG: Tell us about your latest film “Surrogate”?
JTG: “Surrogate” is the remarkable story about the life of poet and journalist Mark O’Brien. Ben Lewin wrote and directed the piece. It was such a refreshing script to read and even more rewarding to work on. Mark O’Brien lived in an Iron Lung due to polio.

MG: How was it working with such a great cast including, John Hawkes, Helen Hunt and Moon Bloodgood?
JTG: I had a brief but very nice role in the film. I spent my time with Moon Bloodgood and John Hawkes. My interaction in the film was with them. They were very welcoming during filming from the moment I arrived until I left. Its always a positive when you have the opportunity to experience someone else’s work process. John and Moon worked very well together, and as a result, I felt completely at ease in communicating with them during the work and between takes.

MG: Tell us about working on the online series, “Dragon Age” due this Summer?
JTG: “Dragon Age’ was a phenomenal time from beginning to end for me. It provided a new experiences for me as an actor. I play a Qunari Warrior and was in a make up chair for 5 hours getting the prosthetics  glued on to me. Wow! It was exciting and exhausting, but when I arrived on set to shoot, I knew from everyone’s reaction that something great was happening.

MG: You are also producing your own New Media series called “Sound Advice”, tell us about it?
JTG: Yes, “Sound Advice”! “He doesn’t mean to be rude … He just is”. That’s the tagline! It’s my five episode rude creation about a dysfunctional therapist who is completely ruthless in his methods. Its an intelligent show that forces you to leave your hangups at the door. The promo clips are already online now but the episodes don’t premiere till July 2011. I wrote, produced and starred in it because as an actor, I’m a strong believer in doing the things that can springboard your advancement. Sean Becker directed it. There is a website: www.soundadviceontheweb.com and I am also hosting it on www.Blip.Tv/soundadvice.

Interview with Constance Zimmer

Constance Zimmer is known best for her role of Dana Gordon on HBO’s “Entourage”. The show is returning on July 24, 2011 for its eighth and final season. But “Entourage” fans don’t worry since a film is also planned after the series ends. Movie Mikes had a chance to chat with Constance about her role in the final season as well as your TV series “Love Bites”.

Mike Gencarelli: What can you tell us about working on the final season of “Entourage”?
Constance Zimmer: I would say its bitter sweet as we all knew it was slowly coming to an end. It definitely felt though like there was more closeness on the set. People are very excited about the season and even though there are only eight episodes, they are all packed since there was a lot of stuff to fit in. The characters all needed to be rounded out so fans weren’t left feeling as though they have missed or lost anything. I think Doug (Ellin) and Ally (Musika) did a great job this year fulfilling each character. I feel Dana Gordon gets a chance to really round out her character. Instead of just seeing her at work we get to see Dana’s other issues going on. This season there is a big mixture between the entertainment business and the characters personal lives which is a lot more like how it is in the entertainment business as it’s not business all the time.

MG: What do you like most about playing Dana Gordon?
CZ: I think for me what has been so great is that the character has progressed every year which has been really fun to do. The fact that I started playing this role seven years ago and was just an assistant to the head of the studio and now I AM the head of the studio is pretty fantastic. It’s also great that Doug (Ellin) got to show a woman in this type of role as there a lot of woman in the business working as executives. Back in the day there was only Sherry Lansing. Now there are so many more and I do believe that the industry was really excited that there was a really strong female representing them. For me this role has been just so great to play and most of the stuff I have done with Jeremy Piven has been a bonus. Jeremy makes you a better actor as he really makes you step up to the plate.

MG: Do you think we will ever see “Entourage” on the big screen?
CZ: I think it’s more of a yes than a no. I think the way that this season ends it could be played into a movie. Everyone would be coming from a different place which will give good conflict to the movie and to the story lines. I think also if a lot of fans come to this season of the show it will show HBO and the word that they want a movie. I mean come on who doesn’t want to see two hours of “Entourage”!

MG: What can you tell us about your show “Love Bites”?
CZ: It’s been a very funny situation with that show because it’s what they call a summer burn off series. If you do to the show it’s pretty much a mini-series because it’s not coming back. We only shot nine episodes and they are pretty much just airing them to be nice. (Laughs)  This has made it really bizarre doing press because I am really excited that its airing, as I think everyone involved is. We have so many great guest stars and have put so much work into the show but it’s another one of those bitter sweet situations where fans ask me when the next season is and I tell them that there isn’t one. I’m just glad that it’s on the air and some people are going to see it. It was great playing a character that was the total opposite of Dana Gordon as I come from comedy and can do other things than just play conservative, bitchy Dana.(Laughs) It will be kind of nice as once “Love Bites” is done airing “Entourage” starts.

MG: Was it always the decision to not do another season or were there other factors?
CZ: We were originally given thirteen episodes and got cut to nine due to the big NBC turn over that happened last year. I think that everyone didn’t know what was going to happen with the new regime that took over. When the new group came in I think there may have been a lot of ‘what do we do’ type decisions. The show is an anthology show which makes it kind of difficult along with the fact that it’s a one hour comedy, which is very rare. The big question was where to put it. Originally the decision was not to air it at all, so the fact that it’s airing this summer is great. It was never the plan to only do one season but I’m just glad it’s airing in general.

MG: What other projects are you working on right now?
CZ: I just finished a movie called “The Babymakers” with Olivia Munn and Paul Schneider, which is an independent movie by The Broken Lizard comedy troop. Right now I am really trying to sink my teeth into doing big comedy’s to remind people that where I come from. I am also doing a play reading. I really like to keep myself busy with things. Here in Los Angeles, pilot series season will start up in a few months so I just hope to get myself back on another show that will have a good of run as “Entourage”. Plus we will be probably shooting a movie next summer any ways!

 

Related Content

Interview with McKenzie Westmore

McKenzie Westmore is the beautiful host of Syfy’s hit show “Face Off”.  She grew up in the field since her father is Michael Westmore who has been in the make-up special effects business for many years.  This makes McKenzie perfect to host the show since she has some great experience in the make-up special effects field.  McKenzie is also well known for her role in the soap opera “Passions”.  Movie Mikes had a chance to chat with McKenzie about working on “Face Off” and well as in the business.

Mike Gencarelli: How did you come to host Syfy’s hit show “Face Off”?
McKenzie Westmore: Some people may or may not know but my father is Michael Westmore who has won multiple Emmys, an Oscar, he has star on the walk of fame and so on. My family has a real rich history in the make-up world starting with my great grandfather which kind of revolves around “Face Off”. When I was a kid I was always in the lab with my dad working on various projects and learning all the ins and outs of the industry. I decided that I wanted to move more towards acting and being in front of the camera. However I still have that love and respect for the behind the scenes work. When “Face off” came along I never really saw myself doing reality television but it was such a perfect tie in that for me if I was going to host anything it would be this type of show. There are certain hosts out there that really don’t make sense on the shows they host but on “Face Off” all the pieces fit perfectly and I just couldn’t say no.

MG: Since you have always been exposed to special makeup effects, was it like second nature to you watching the contestants work?
MW: When I first walked into the lab of “Face Off” all the smells of the chemicals reminded me of home and it really brought me back to when I was a kid on the set of “Star Trek” or wherever my dad was working. For a long time my dad’s lab was attached to our house so I could go in there and see all these great creations my dad had done and that I was part of. The show really was second nature. I am definitely not on the level as our judges but I could give a certain perspective since I grew up in this industry and saw things firsthand.

MG: What would you say was the most rewarding part of working on the show?
MW: I would have to say that all the guys at mission control were really great and a pleasure to work for. They really made my job easy and it was fun to go into work every day. On the creative side it was really great to see what the artists could turn out within a couple hours. Even from my dad’s perspective some of the things were almost impossible. It was a pleasure and joy to see the creations come to life.

MG: They are currently auditioning for season two; do you have a process with that?
MW: No, I do not. I think there might be some things coming up but I don’t want to give away too much. I think casting is winding down as we are starting shooting in the Fall.

MG: What can we expect from the show in season two?
MW: I really don’t know anything right now as everything is kept under lock and key. I do know that it’s going to be twice the creativity and the challenges will be a little harder. Some challenges will remain the same for however long we do the show but, I think the ante will be upped this season. We are also adding two episodes which in turn adds more contestants.

MG: Having worked on soap operas for nearly 10 years, tell us about your experience on those shows?
MW: I have an appreciation for reality television but soap operas really aren’t too far off from that. Both are go, go, go type of shooting and the hours can be very long. It was a bit different though with soap operas because you’re playing a scripted character that needs to have a motivation. With the reality series it’s just me giving challenges praying to God that I give the instructions correctly. It was a lot of fun getting to experience reality television hosting and I look forward to doing more.

MG: You father, Michael Westmore, worked on “Star Trek” franchise, how was it getting to work with him on projects from “Insurrection” to “Voyager” to “The Next Generation”?
MW: It was amazing! When he was working in the lab I was always helping him out there. I remember he was sculpting an alien and there was clay everywhere. I came along and started sticking pieces of clay around the ears and on the neck and my dad really liked it and left them in. I think it was a Cardesian that he was working on. As an actor, the different times I got to be on “Star Trek” were fantastic from being a kid on “Star Trek: Next Generation” then being 20 years old doing “Star Trek: Voyager” was amazing.  “Star Trek: Voyager” was really fun because it was a guest starring role that had the potential of becoming a regular character that was going to be the love interest for Ensign Kim. However the offer for “Passions” had come along and I was only given a maybe from “Star Trek” and “Passions” was offering me a 3 year contract.

MG: Tell us about your upcoming films “Dose of Reality” & “Vile”?
MW: Those are two totally different films. For some reason lately I keep being cast as the puppet master [Laughs]. We just finished shooting  “Dose of Reality” the other day. We did all outdoor night shoots on that project from about 6pm till 6am. Fairuza Baulk stars in the film and she has been someone I have been dreaming of working with since I saw her in “The Craft”. It’s a well done script and is one of those drama/thriller type films. I think once it hits the festival circuit people are going to want to see it a couple times. The twist in the end just blew my mind. I actually had to re-read the script because I thought I had missed something. It’s a fantastic mind bender. “Vile” is about a car full of college kids on their way home from a weekend getaway. My character is in need of help and approaches the kids. After being helped I gas the entire car and take the kids to a house where they are held hostage. In order for them to get free they must torture each other which releases chemicals into a vile inserted in to each of their necks. Once the vile is full they are released. It’s a pretty amazing story line.

Interview with Connor McCullagh

Connor McCullagh recently competed and won in season one of SyFy’s hit show “Face Off”. Connor has also worked on various high profile projects most recently with “Big Mommas House: Like Father, Like Son” and TV’s “The Walking Dead” & “The Vampire Diaries”. He is currently working on the film “The Hunger Games”. Movie Mikes had a chance to chat with Connor about winning “Face Off” and also his work on TV and film.

Mike Gencarelli: Tell us about your experience on the show, Syfy’s “Face Off”?

Connor McCullagh: “Face Off” was a very unique experience. It not only put my skills to the test, but it also tested my determination and my nerves. It wasn’t easy going through challenge after challenge for a solid month.

MG: How did you end up on the show and what do you think you have gained since winning?

CM: The producers held an open casting call in Orlando where I was teaching at the time. I spent a couple weeks creating prosthetics for the audition, and showed up. I guess the rest of it is history. Since the show aired I’ve done a few conventions, but the biggest benefit has been the working relationship I’ve developed with Ve Niell. We are currently working on “The Hunger Games”.

MG: How was it working on “Big Mommas House: Like Father, Like Son”?

CM: “Big Momma’s III” was a great gig. I was hired by Wesley Wofford who work on all the Big Mamma’s films. Martin Lawrence was a pleasure to work with as well. Every morning, he would sit, motionless, in the makeup chair watching “The Wire” while Wes and I applied his prosthetics. I wish more jobs were as easy as that one.

MG: Tell us about working with Greg Nicotero on “The Walking Dead” & “The Vampire Diaries”?

CM: Working on “The Walking Dead” was a great experience. That was my first time working with Greg Nicotero and I felt like we really hit it off. The work was difficult as we were dealing with mob scenes of 50+ zombies in 100 degree heat, but I would do it again in a heart beat.

“The Vampire Diaries” was a different story. My first day on set, the production manager told me that they never made an allowance for an on set makeup FX guy. It was a slow, 8 month downward spiral from there. Most of the time, I was powdering noses. Occasionally, I would make a new set of fangs or apply a small bite wound on one of the actors. But, it just wasn’t the type of show that required someone like me. Fortunately, the cast was great to work with. A really nice bunch of people.

MG: How did you end up working with the Farrelly Brothers on films like “Me, Myself & Irene” & “Shallow Hall”?

CM: Back in the late 90s and early 2000s, I was working for makeup FX company called Alterian. They do all of the Farely bother’s films.The last one I worked on was “Stuck On You”. I left Alterian in 2004. By 2005, I moved to East coast and started keying more independent features, which really rekindled my love for makeup effects.

MG: What would you say has been your most difficult project to work on to date?

CM: There’s a lot of different things that can make a project “difficult”. FX wise, I think some of the most challenging work I’ve done would be a regeneration effect I supervised on a film called “Bones”. It was me two of my colleagues and friends, Lilo Tavou and Fred Fraliegh, creating all these body parts out of wax and gelatin to melt in front of slow speed cameras along with different effects for veins and tendons traveling up arms and into the neck and head of Snoop Dog’s lifeless remains. Yet, as difficult as it was I still look back, fondly, of the whole experience. We were so exhausted by the time it was over, but we got along great and produced some effects that we were very proud of.

MG: Is horror generally your favorite genre to work in, if not favorite?

CM: As a makeup effects artist, horror is a big part of my life. I love a good horror film, but I really prefer the sci-fi fantasy films over the slasher films. I enjoy creating creatures and would love to see the creature feature make a come back. Unfortunately, the sci-fi genre seems dominated by CGI these days.

MG: What do you have planned upcoming?

CM: I’m going to be on “The Hunger Games” until Fall. I have several tentative offers after that, but I’m really looking forward to taking a vacation. It’s been a crazy year and I haven’t treated myself in a long time.

 

Related Content

Interview with Paul Sampson

Paul Sampson is not only acting but also writing, producing, directing and even stunt coordinating in his latest film “Night of the Templar”.  This is Paul’s directorial debut and is packed with one amazing cast, including David Carradine, in one of his last roles, as well as Udo Kier, Norman Reedus and Billy Drago.  Movie Mikes had a chance to chat with Paul about “Night of the Templar” and reflected on working with such a great cast.

Mike Gencarelli: Did you find it difficult to direct since it was your first feature, and also while acting in the film?
Paul Sampson: No, Directing came very natural to me on set. I don’t know why, but it was second nature. I’m an Actor, and I found it easy to relate to the other Actors. In knowing the craft, I allowed the Actors to do their thing. However, I could easily tell when they weren’t ‘honest’ in their performance, and needed guidance or another take. All the seasoned actors really trusted my Direction and confided in me. And when I acted in a scene it just put me that one step closer, so it actually made it even easier to Direct when I was Acting. Only problem was that I couldn’t see the camera work when I was in the scene and we had some problems with that in post. I could have used another one of me to make sure the framing was correct, and more so the continuity and strange things like people being in the shot…I’m serious…there were a lot of shots that I was in as an actor that had crew members in the shots or like a sandbag or coffee cup. But the creative decision making came very easy for me. Producing… now that’s a pain in the neck…especially when all the money’s not in place.

MG: Can you reflect on working with David Carradine?
PS: That question is two-fold or perhaps three. First, working with him in the capacity of Actor-Actor; Second, Director-Actor; and then third, well…it’s David Carradine. David loved the script, he accepted the role within 24 hours and told his manager to tell me immediately that he wanted to do the movie. If you don’t know how it works, a lot of time when you deal with someone’s ‘representation’ they’ll make you wait until the last minute to let you know if they will ‘pass’ or take the role. Anyway, we’re on set and the Production Manager, Jack, approaches me and tells me that David Carradine has arrived (it was David’s first day), and he’s in his trailer and he wants to see me. I was running through some stuff with the D.P. and told Jack to get David through make up and that I’ll see him when he’s out and I’m finished what I’m doing. Jack moved closer to me and said, very seriously… and almost worried, “Paul, the last movie he did, he demanded a fruit basket in his trailer every day.” I looked at Jack, put my hand on his shoulder and told him that I appreciated the insight. A half an hour or so later I stopped by David’s trailer. I walked in and we just looked at each other for a moment. Kind of like two guys in a bar sizing each other up… and then he recognized it was me, who he thought it’ll be (we had met before on a movie). On cue, we shook hands and he told me he admired my writing and didn’t want to play games with me, and that he told his manager to call me right away to tell me that he was in. I told him I appreciated that. Also, he said he ‘asked around about me with a few people’ and he didn’t want to jerk me around. I thanked him again, and then the conversation got funny. Jokingly, I told him that I had also asked around about him. He gave me an inquisitive look, and then said, “And…” I got really close to him, earshot away, and I said, ‘You’re not going to try to muscle me for a daily fruit basket, are you” There was a beat and then he started laughing. He said, “No, not you, as a matter of fact, I have something for you.” He reached over to the table, moved his sides (scenes for the day) and uncovered a coin that was in a plastic package. He gave me a gift, a 1922 Liberty Silver Dollar. He went on about why he picked that gift (for me), but I was so into the coin I didn’t catch all of it, my mind was somewhere else. See, I use to collect coins when I was a kid, in as much as a poor kid could collect coins, and it was like ‘wow’, this is cool. I don’t know who enjoyed the gift more, me, or him watching me study the coin. He asked me if I liked the gift and I said something funny like, “A dollar, that’s it, you’re giving me a dollar?” He laughed, patted me on the back and we ran our scene. We got along really well the entire time he worked on the movie. He lost his cool one night and yelled for about a minute or two. I just stood there and let him rant. We were both holding swords so it’s probably better I didn’t take it personally and react. I was pretty calm the whole time… I just let him get it off his chest. It was a long day, and now it was 3 in the morning. I let everyone clear out and had a talk with David a couple of minutes later, alone. He apologized several times, and trust me, David isn’t the apologizing type. He was very honest, always, he said what he felt. No holds barred type of guy. I asked him what was wrong and he told me straight out, “It’s your crew, they’re going to fuck up your movie, don’t let them fuck up your movie, you have a great script, you’re doing great as an actor and director, but don’t let the crew fuck up your movie.” I smiled, and said to him, if it’s the crew, then why were you yelling ‘around’ me. He said because I had big shoulders and I could handle it. He apologized again and said that it was bothering him because he thought the movie (script) had potential, and that if he’s vested in something, then he’s a perfectionist. I told him, I was a perfectionist, too. He said, “No, you’re more of a lunatic.” I was like, “You’re calling me a lunatic, isn’t that the pot calling the kettle black?”, and he laughed and again said I was more of a lunatic… but that it worked for me. We talked for close to an hour or so. If I told you the entire conversation you wouldn’t believe it, so I’ll save it. Some of it was very personal, some just really bizarre. It was as if we bonded in levels on the shoot. And that was another one. After we wrapped, he’d call me from time to time to check in on me, see how I was doing, and ask if I needed any help. He’d always bring up the yelling moment and apologize. He told me if I needed another day out of him he’s do it for free. And he’d always ask to see the work in progress of the movie and I’d be like soon, give me a little more time David, and then we’ll watch it. The last time we spoke was the week before he left for Thailand. He wanted to check in on me and see what I cut so far. I was almost about to run by his house and show him the rough cut and then I was like, you know what, David, when you get back I’ll show you, let me fix a couple more things. And he was like, fair enough, but when I get back, we’re watching it. He didn’t come back. I kind of regret not showing him, I wanted to wait til’ I had it a little better. I should have showed him. If not for anything else, it would have been cool to hang out with him just one more time. But you know what, I believe there’s more to all this, here, in this ‘world’ we live in. David was very spiritual in his own way. He’s around. He sees the movie. I’m positive about that. It’s funny in a way, the more we were around each other, the better we liked each other. We spoke a lot privately. We laughed a lot. We got along really well, and it shows in the movie. Some things you can fake on a movie set, some you can’t. When you watch the movie, you can tell that we’re real friends, old soul mates so to speak. It reads through when you watch the film.

MG: How did you go about getting the rest of the great cast of my favorites, including Udo Kier, Norman Reedus and Billy Drago?
PS: I shot the Medieval part of the movie first, in which I played Lord Gregoire. I used more ‘repertory’ actors because I wanted that aspect of the film to have more of a storybook theatrical feel to it. And then when the time came time for me to cast the Modern day shoot of the movie, well, I wanted more ‘contemporary’ actors. I have a lot of friends that are actors, so it wasn’t easy… decisions… decisions. Now Norman (Reedus) and I are very good friends. He knows and trusts me as an artist. I’ve heard him brag about me and speak highly (of me) to others. It’s incredibly fulfilling when not just a friend, but a pier like Norman Reedus respects you as a man and as an artist. We have a mutual respect in that way. He had complete faith in me and the project from the start. And that was prior to him seeing the footage from the medieval shoot, which he later saw and thought was cool. Before I even finished asking him to be a part of the project he told me he was on board. I was honoured to have my friend with me for my directorial debut.
So basically, for the Modern Day part of the movie, the cast began with Norman (and me). From there, we brained stormed and Udo Kier’s name came up in conversation. Norman called Udo for me and told him I was going to have a script dropped off for him to read. He was out of town in Palm Springs. A few days later I got from him (Udo) and he told me he wanted to talk to me about the script, but it needed to be in person. He then invited me to his home for lunch. We had our first meeting. He made me a sandwich. It was very tasty. I had noted on the script that was dropped off for Udo that I wanted him to play a certain role in the movie. And at his home, I learned that was what he wanted to talk to me about in person. He wanted to play the Priest instead, and asked if I was open to calling the Priest character “Father Paul” and that it was a good German Priest name. He then left the room and came back with a Priest outfit, and kind of ‘modeled’ it for me. It was stunning as I chewed my sandwich and drank my glass of milk. I responded, “So what you’re saying is that you’d rather play the Priest.” And then Udo, referring to his outfit, said in his German accent, “Why, yes, why do you think I have this here, Paul Sampson, for my health.” So now it was Norman, Udo and me. The next person on board was Max Perlich. I know you didn’t ask about Maxy in your question, but I’m going to mention him anyway. I went over a couple of names with Norman and he agreed with me on my choice of using Max. We both know Max and I knew he was perfect for the role. When I called him, I changed my voice for a goof, and asked for Mr. Max Perlich, he didn’t know it was me and said in a fake accent that I had the wrong number, gave me a bogus name, and then quickly hung up. I think he owed money to someone and thought I was a collector on the other line, it was hysterical. I mean, it was so obvious that it was him. So I waited a day or two and called him back and told him it was me. And then we were four. Now Billy (Drago) was one of those gifts from God situations. Up to a month before shooting, the role of “Shauna the Chef” was meant to be played by a stout, middle aged, Irish woman. And then something made me change it last minute to a cross dresser. It just seemed wrong enough to be right for the movie. Surprisingly, I got a lot of submissions for the role. I never realized how many actors wanted to do a role in drag…and I’m talking recognizable names. I filled the slot right away with another somewhat known actor, but I’ll cut a lot of the story out… he was a no-show on his first day of shooting because he was strung out on Heroine. No name needs to be mentioned, I’m just surprised that up to this point he still hasn’t manned up and called me to talk about it. I know we all have problems at times, I’ve been around it my whole life, but it kind of bothers me more that he still hasn’t come to me and had a conversation, even more so than the fact that he didn’t show up. Anyway, it really screwed up the schedule because he was demanding on what days he could work and I was already juggling the schedule around. Cutting to the chase, it really messed me up and cost me time and money. In the middle of the chaos, I called Michael Greenwald at Buchwald Agency on his cell and told him I wanted Billy Drago to be in my movie. Michael was like okay, send a script, make an offer, and give us a couple of weeks to get back to you. I was like, Mike, you don’t understand, I need Billy here tomorrow… in wardrobe … at 11 am. You have to understand, it doesn’t work like this in Hollywood. You don’t call in the middle of the afternoon and get someone like Billy Drago to show up the next day on set. There is a protocol, the agent has to receive the script and offer, they have to run it through the process, and then – if they deem it worthy – they pass it along to the actor, who needs his time alone with the material, and then there’s a truck load of things that happen from there. It takes time…well, it’s supposed to take time. Luckily, Michael’s a buddy of mine. So I tell Michael quickly what the film’s about, and tell him that Billy might know who I am, that we had met before – we were both doing (different) movies in Bulgaria and I was with Norman and we saw Billy at an establishment in Sofia while we were on the shoot, blah blah, and so on… And also I told Michael to tell Billy who was playing what roles so he could visualize it when he read the script… and oh, yeah, I told Michael to also tell Billy he wears a dress in the movie. Michael laughed at that, and then I told him I was being serious. I remember there was that awkward moment of silence on the phone after I told Michael that Billy had to wear a dress in the movie. Anyway, Michael just let me know he’ll pass it along immediately but he said it’s up to Billy ultimately. I was fine with that. Billy got the script, read it and got back to his agent right away…within hours. I look at the film and watch Billy and I can’t imagine anybody else playing that role. He was flawless. If he went past one take it wasn’t because he was off, it was because of another actor or a technical problem. He was on every take! I really got lucky with Billy, the “other guy” would have been a problem, and then there would have been more problems… because as work begets work… problems on set, beget more problems on set. In the end, besides it screwing up the shoot a bit, the initial misfortune of the other actor being strung out on heroine was a blessing in disguise. Again, I’m disappointed that he still hasn’t contacted me. It’s not manly. I thought much higher of him. I guess I was wrong. I have to end this particular answer by reiterating that Norman was intricate in the modern day casting of the movie as far as the main potatoes. If he wasn’t on board initially, there probably would have been no Udo, and so on. The casting would have went down in an entirely different direction. It still would have been good, but what I ended up with was great! I just can’t imagine it being better than what it was in the end. Everyone in the movie is who they should be … if that makes any sense whatsoever.

MG: Since the project what independently financed what would you say was your biggest challenge?
PS: Well, you kind of answered that question in the question. Yes, it was independently financed, and because of the magnitude of the film, it was a much larger budget than most Indy films. Horses, Costumes, Chain Mail, Weaponry, Action, extensive Props and Automobiles, Classic Songs, et cetera, start to add up very quickly. And even though I negotiated well, I still raised every penny myself. That was challenging. A lot of the financing was hand to mouth as the project went along. If the money had been in place prior to production, it would have made things a lot easier. As I mentioned before, the Creative stuff was second nature, even if I hadn’t done it before. Producing without having all the money in place was the biggest challenge.

MG: Now that you have directing under your belt, what do you have planned next?
PS: Once I have the movie in place to sell, I think I’ll see what’s offered to me as an actor and take a role or two in something I want to be a part of… that’ll be like a vacation to me … to just act in a movie and have to do nothing else.

“Night of the Templar” Official website: http://www.nightofthetemplar.com
Paul Sampson’s Official website: http://www.paulsampson.net

Paul Sampson IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0760196/
“Night of the Templar” IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0768222/combined

Interview with Tara Browne

Tara Browne is the writer/producer and director of the short documentary called “I Met a Man From Burma”. The film is an intimate portrait of struggle and the importance of home, as told through the eyes of Ler Wah Lo Bo. Ler Wah is a Burmese refugee, who tells his life story and that of his country. The film is premiering at this year’s Reel Causes in affiliation with VIFF at the Vancouver International Film Centre in Vancouver. Tara took some time to chat with Movie Mikes about her inspiration for the film.

Mike Gencarelli: How did you meet Ler Wah Lobo and what inspired you to create the short film “I Met a Man from Burma”?
Tara Browne: I met Ler Wah Lo Bo at my friend´s place who happens to be one of the organizers from “The Canadian Campaign for Free Burma” here in Toronto.

MG: How it directing, writing and producing your first project?
TB: I enjoyed it because you in way have more creative control. But alot of work and role switching. I´ve been lucky to have solid people around me that support and help me define that.

MG: I love the music and the editing, tell us about that?
TB: The editor is Oren Harad, he is originally from Mexico and based here in Toronto. He specializes in documentaries and commercials. He is one of the best editors I have ever worked with, I hope to work with Oren again…if he´s not too busy…(laughs). As for the music, the composer is from New York, his name is Darren Morze. I was actually sending him the film via my FTP site and we went back and forth for a couple months. It was an online relationship…(laughs) but easy because he naturally got the concept. It just all perfectly fit into place for this piece. I´m fortunate to have such talented people to work with.

MG: You are running an online petition to help Ler Wah to get permanent residence in Canada, tell us about that?
TB: The Canadian government has labelled Ler Wah Lo Bo as a “refugee” because he fought for freedom in his country. They have not granted him permanent residency for 8 years. I think he is a prisioner in a way… because he can´t really leave Canada. He just wants to have the freedom to see his grandchildren and visit wife´s grave in the US. It is a shame because he is a huge activist for his country and has given back so much to the Burmese community here in Toronto as a translater and advocate. If people want to sign the petition or read more about it, you can go to www.divfacefilms.com.  Each signature gets us closer to helping Ler Wah get his permanent residence.

MG: Tell us about your approach as director?
TB: Its a bit hard to explain the artistic process but what I can say is that I didn´t want him to appear as a “Burmese Refugee” but rather a person, a man and individual that we can all relate to… outside of his country.

MG: Tell us about Diversity Face Films?
TB: Its mission is to promote diverse faces on screen, diverse or “unique stories”, and diverse crews from around the world. I feel the world is diverse and I hope our films can be more reflective of that.

MG: What do you have planned next?
TB: I just finished co-writing a TV pilot for “The Poacher” a 1890?s Western drama, a feature film based on the life of a Canadian international folk singer and short documentary Diversity Face series. Too much work ahead of me!

“The Human Centipede” Interview Series

Truly one-of-a-kind, Tom Six’s twisted biological horror film “The Human Centipede” confidently goes where few films have dared to go. The sick vision of a demented surgeon, a role portrayed so brilliantly by Dieter Laser it is sure to join Freddy, Jason, and Leatherface in the horror pantheon, is a 100% medically accurate nightmare.

Premise for “The Human Centipede”:
During a stopover in Germany in the middle of a carefree roadtrip through Europe, two American girls find themselves alone at night when their car breaks down in the woods. Searching for help at a nearby villa, they are wooed into the clutches of a deranged retired surgeon who explains his mad scientific vision to his captives’ utter horror. They are to be the subjects of his sick lifetime fantasy: to be the first to connect people, one to the next, via their gastric system, and in doing so bring to life ‘the human centipede’.

Fans of the first film can rejoice that Tom Six has already completed the second film in the series titled “The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence)”, which has been scheduled for release on DVD in 2011 but was refused a classification for distribution in the UK due to its explicit content.

Click here to check out our review of the film
Click here to play the 8-bit video game for “The Human Centipede”


Akihiro Kitamura

Ashley C. Williams

Ashlynn Yennie

Dieter Laser

Interview with Dieter Laser

Dieter Laser is known best for his role of Dr. Heiter in “The Human Centipede”.  Dieter portrayal of that characters ranks as one of the best/creepiest villains that I have ever seen.  Movie Mikes had a chance to chat with Dieter about his role and what else he has planned.

Mike Gencarelli: What did you like most about playing Dr. Heiter in “The Human Centipede”?
Dieter Laser: I loved the pitch black humor in it – funny and scary at the same time. I loved the downfall from an insane German “Demigod” with a spotless white doctor’s coat to a bloody snakelike “Subhuman” crawling across the tiles like a centipede.

MG: How did you prepare for such a demented & dark character?
DL: When you read a novel you gradually start to “see” and even “feel” the characters on your mind’s screen – same thing with a script. I’m reading a script every day, very early in the morning and very slowly up to a hundred times, thereby enhancing this common effect of visualization. Discovering under the entertaining surface the different layers of diverse combinations and rich possibilities to interpret the stuff. Trusting my guts, waiting patiently for the character to come alive on my mind’s “silver screen”. Watching “Him” carefully when He shyly shows up… and finally, when He seems to feel quite comfortable I slowly start to mimic what He’s doing.

MG: How was it working with Tom Six, did he give you creative freedom for the role?
DL: Tom Six and his sister, the wonderful producer Ilona Six, gave me every thinkable creative freedom, support and trust, and if you are treated like this, you only can try to pay back, and that explains the splendid chemistry we had every day at the set. Tom knows precisely what he wants to do and has the rare talent to provide you with generous freedom and leadership at the same time.

MG: We interviewed Akihiro Kitamura and his first impression of the script was that it was hilarious, what was your first impression?
DL: I got my first impression through a meeting with Tom and Ilona. Tom told me very defined and detailed the whole movie in real time. After 90 minutes I was so fascinated by his vision, precision and obsession that we came to a deal even during this meeting. Later on when the script arrived I got scared. I hadn’t in fact realized the whole consequences of the premise (“Feed her!”) – and I was afraid. Then in my early morning sessions with the script I discovered under the plain surface “The Nazi-Doctor”! – and that led me to the “Angel of Death”, to the Nazi concentration camp physician Dr. Josef Mengele, who gruesomely experimented with twins. Therefore Tom and I decided to baptize Dr. Heiter with his first name “Joseph”. – Now I had found my “vehicle” and how to drive my character through the whole story no matter how disgusting things would become. So I got a lot of fun out of it, to kick my criminal German ancestors in their balls, making dark jokes about their twisted anal retentive Nazi-Psyche! Assholes like Dr. Heiter, who divided mankind in “Supermen” (themselves) and “Subhumans” (all the others) treating Human Beings like insects, like poor centipedes.

MG: You played villians in both the TV series “Lexx” and “The Human Centipede”, Do you enjoying playing the bad guy?
DL: Despite of these villains I always have preferred to be a “character actor” playing complicated and broken guys. If I can choose between a part with a candy bar or a part with a gun, I always will take the gun.

MG: How can you reflect on the banning of “The Human Centipede II (The Full Sequence) in the UK?
DL: It’s a pity for the UK audience and a big advertisement for the world market. I had the privilege to see some stills, they looked absolutely fascinating.

MG: Are you generally a fan of the horror genre?
DL: Not generally, but I love movies like “The Silence of the Lambs” or “The Shining” for example.

MG: What do you have planned next?
DL: I’m on stage tour with Shakespeare and Samuel Beckett – and I’m waiting for the right part in the right script for the right movie. I already had to turn down eight offers this year, so “The Right Movie” should be pretty close by now – hopefully taking place in the beloved United States of America! – Anyway there are new plans with Tom and Ilona Six for December/January – so let’s just wait and let us see!