EXCLUSIVE First Look Trailer: “RIP (Recovery in Progress)” from Ryan Kruger, director of FRIED BARRY

8 years in the making, RIP (Recovery in Progress) is an experimental short film collection. To date, the shorts have screened at selected genre film festivals around the world and have picked up numerous awards. With the exception of Fried Barry, none of these have been released online as the intention was always to release them as an impactful collection.

DIRECTOR’S NOTE (Ryan Kruger) I had found myself at a point in my career, where I was frustrated with purely investing my time and energy in music videos alone. I had full creative control with each video’s narrative and how they were shot. However, I was still restricted by music genre and content. I felt that I couldn’t push the boundaries or my visual style. This was of course all before Fried Barry. These creative restrictions built up feelings of depression and deep frustration at the lack of artistic expression that I was confined to. So I decided, I would work towards completing a number of experimental films that allowed me to truly express myself and fulfill my creative needs. This led to a 8 year project that I am proud to present to the world and looking back I am grateful for the hard times, as this collection of short films was the creative seed that led to the birth of my feature film, Fried Barry.

EXPERIMENTAL FILMMAKING Personally, experimental filmmaking is a unique and powerful art form that allows us to be artists in the truest sense. The word “experimental” is all about trying something new and different…so different that, at first, it can cause confusion, or make the viewer feel uncomfortable. Some films revel in disorder or chaos, ideas colliding without enforced structure, others are milder and convey surreal imagery and/or visual metaphors. Many of these films are intended to be shocking and horrific, but all are open to a multitude of interpretations. Experimental filmmaking is a world of its own, and it’s one that is often overlooked by the majority of filmmakers these days.

Film Review: “Gladiator II” (Review #2)

  • GLADIATOR II
  • Starring: Paul Mescal, Denzel Washington
  • Directed by: Ridley Scott
  • Rating: R
  • Running Time: 2 hrs 48 mins
  • Paramount Pictures

 

Our score:  4 out of 5

 

One of the best sequels to be released in movie theaters since “Godfather II”, the long-awaited follow-up to 2000’s “Gladiator” has everything you could want in a cinematic experience and then some. Terrific direction by Ridley Scott, glorious cinematography by John Mathieson, an entertaining script and superb acting all help to turn the silver screen golden. While Scott has taken some liberties with facts, he again manages to still blend in historical characters with fictional ones without making a mess of things as most directors of historical fiction do.

 

For those who haven’t seen it yet, to which I would ask, “What are you waiting for?”, “Gladiator II” is set 16 years after the events of its predecessor. The Roman Empire is now ruled by twin emperors – Geta and Caracalla. (Fact check – they were not twins as depicted in the film.) Both are unstable by any definition of the word as they have an unquenchable thirst for more territory. General Acacius (Pedro Pascal) has helped to facilitate that win many successful campaigns, but much like General Maximus, he has grown weary of combat.

 

During one of these campaigns, General Acacius leads an invasion of a North African country where Lucius, the son of Lucilla (Connie Nielsen) and grandson of murdered Emperor Marcus Aurelius, is living under an assumed name. He is captured after the battle and turned into a gladiator by conniving stable master Macrinus (Denzel Washington) who promises Lucius the opportunity to kill General Acacius.

 

Just as visually stunning as the original with fantastic costume designs, “Gladiator II” has a captivating story that has a seamless, natural transition from the ending of “Gladiator”. Pascal is the breakout performer of the year after several smaller roles in his young career. He makes the movie his own with a ferocious acting performance that warrants at least the consideration to be nominated. Washington is equally grand in his supporting role which also deserves golden statue talk. It never gets old to see Washington in a not-so-heroic role.

 

There are a couple of scenes with speeches that are a little hokey, but overall, it’s a fantastic work that captures the absolute insanity that was sometimes Rome.

 

“Gladiator 2” receives four stars out of five.

Film Review: “A Complete Unknown”

 

  • A COMPLETE UNKNOWN
  • Starring:  Timotee Chalamet,  Elle Fanning and Edward Norton
  • Directed by:  James Mangold
  • Rated:  R
  • Running time:  2 hrs 21 mins
  • Searchlight

Our score:  5 out of 5

 

If I just wrote the superlatives that have been used to describe the music of Bob Dylan for the past five decades this review would be 1,000 words long.  So let me just throw out a few.  Genius.  America’s troubadour.  And, my favorite, the greatest artist, in any medium, of all time.  With multiple Grammy awards, an Oscar and, oh yeah, both a Pulitzer and Nobel Prize, there isn’t much he hasn’t done.  But how did young Robert Zimmerman from Hibbings, Minnesota, become Bob Dylan?  “A Complete Unknown” fills in the blanks.

 

New York City.  1961.  A young man wanders the streets of Greenwich Village, intent to visit his idol, the great folk musician Woody Guthrie (Scoot McNairy) who is currently in the hospital.  He finagles his way to Guthrie’s room, where he also meets another of his heroes, Pete Seeger (Norton).  With the support of these two men, the world will soon meet, as Joan Baez called him, “the unwashed phenomenon, the original vagabond.”  Say hello to Bob Dylan.

 

It has to be extremely difficult to make a film about a performer that the entire world knows.  Rami Malek in “Bohemian Rhapsody,” Jamie Foxx in “Ray” and both Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon in “Walk the Line” – also brilliantly directed by James Mangold – hit all of the right notes with both fans and critics.  As quite possibly the best film of the year, “A Complete Unknown” most definitely deserves a slot on that short list.

The film’s casting is spot on.  Chalamet, who not only embodies Dylan in speech patterns and mannerisms but does his own singing, channels the rebellious energy that made Dylan a folk hero.  As I told the studio rep after the screening, “give that kid the Oscar now.”  And Chalamet is surrounded by an amazing cast, led by Norton.  When we first meet Pete Seeger he is fighting for his freedom in court, having to address the backlash from his song, “This Land is Your Land.”  Fanning stars as Sylvie Russo, Bob’s on and off again girlfriend based, I’m sure, on Dylan’s friend Suze Rotello, who is featured with Dylan on the cover of his album “The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan.”  We are also introduced to other great musicians of the era, including a performer my high school Spanish teacher, Mr. Guggino, used to refer to as JO-ANN BAZE,  Joan Baez (Monica Barbaro) and Johnny Cash (Boyd Holbrook).  All of the actors do amazing work, especially capturing the vocal qualities that made their characters stars.

 

Mangold’s direction is straight ahead and on point, and there isn’t a wasted frame of film on screen.  But it’s the music that fans will be going for, and they will not be disappointed.  With so many great songs over fifty years, it’s had to remember all of the songs Dylan wrote that either he performed or that he gave to others.  But they were ahead of their time then and remain beloved now.

 

On a scale of zero to five, I give “A Complete Unknown” ★★★

 

Film Review: “Mufasa: The Lion King”

 

  • MUFASA: THE LION KING
  • Starring the voices of:  Aaron Pierre, Tiffany Boone and Mads Mikkelsen
  • Directed by:  Barry Jenkins
  • Rated:  PG
  • Running time:  1 hr 58 mins
  • Walt Disney Pictures

Our score:  5 out of 5

 

When the animated film “The Lion King” was released in 1994, it was another example of the amazing second golden age of Disney Animation, grossing almost $1 billion around the world.  So popular was the film that it spawned both a highly successful Broadway show (still running both in New York and around the world) and a live-action version, released in 2019 which, until this past year’s “Inside Out 2,” was the highest grossing animated feature film ever released, earing more than $1.6 billion.  So it’s safe to say that the story of Simba is pretty well known.  But what about his father, Mustafa?  Wonder no more.

 

The film begins with the now adult Simba (Donald Glover…I guess Matthew Broderick was busy) departing his kingdom to welcome a new cub into the family.  He leaves his young cub in the very suspect hands (paws?  Hooves/) of Timon and Pumba (Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen), who are quickly assisted by Rafiki (John Kani).  In order to bide their time together, the trio decide to tell the story of Simba’s father, Mustafa.  And a grand story it is.

 

Beautifully rendered (this is by far the best live-action/animated film I’ve ever seen), “Mufasa: The Lion King” does a great job of introducing new characters while letting the audience reconnect with familiar ones.

 

We meet Mustafa (Braelyn Rankins) as a young cub who finds himself lost and taken in by a kindly lioness.  The leader of the pride is not happy with this outsider and banishes him to live with “the women,” meaning he will have to learn to hunt to provide for the rest of the pride.  Mufasa is befriended by Taka (Theo Somolu), the son of the leader, and the two grow up as brothers.  But, as in the original film, when jealousy rears its ugly head, even brotherly love is not enough.

Thanks to the voice actors, and the amazingly realistic visuals, the film is a most welcome addition to the “Lion King” lineage.  Ostensibly a musical, the songs – by the great Lin-Manuel Miranda – are almost secondary to the film.  Tim Rice and Elton John are a hard act for anyone to follow but the tunes here are quite hummable.

 

Of course, for many, the voice of Mustafa is and always will be, the late James Earl Jones.  Jones was asked to reprise the role but declined.  The film is dedicated to his amazing and endering memory.

 

On a scale of zero to five, “Mustafa: The Lion King” receives ★★★★★.

Regular Show: The Complete Series Is Coming To DVD For The First Time Ever On 2/4!!!

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Regular Show: The Complete Series

Enjoy The Hit Series on DVD February 4

BURBANK, CA (December 19, 2024) Cartoon Network’s Emmy® Award-winning animated comedy series is coming to DVD for the first time ever, with the release of Regular Show: The Complete Series on DVD February 4, 2025. Get ready to binge on all 245 episodes of the hit series starring Mordecai, Rigby and their collection of pals, along with a bodacious assortment of special features, and a movie!!!, which add up to more than 50 HOURS of content!

ABOUT THE REGULAR SHOW: THE COMPLETE SERIES:

Regular Show follows the lives of best friends Mordecai and Rigby, whose lazy afternoon adventures always seem to be interrupted by zombies and misadventures with their gang of friends Benson, Pops, Muscle Man, Hi-Five Ghost, Skips, Thomas, Margaret and Eileen or sometimes even dealing with Death himself.

Created by JG Quintel and produced by Cartoon Network Studios, the series originally premiered in September 2010 and remains to be a massive hit with new and old fans alike. The show has inspired consumer products ranging from collectibles, apparel, accessories, and games available at major retailers nationwide.

A new Regular Show project is currently in production at Cartoon Network Studios.

Regular Show: The Complete Series

Includes all 245 episodes created over the years, including specials, and a movie.

PRODUCT                       

DVD                                 

Audio: English

Subtitles: English

Running Time: 50 Hours

Rated: TV-PG

About Warner Bros. Discovery Home Entertainment

Warner Bros. Discovery Home Entertainment (WBDHE) distributes the award-winning movies, television, animation, and digital content produced by Warner Bros. Discovery to the homes and screens of millions through physical Blu-ray Disc™ and DVD retail sales and digital transactions on major streaming, video-on-demand cable, satellite, digital, and mobile channels. WBDHE is part of Warner Bros. Discovery Content Sales, one of the world’s largest distributors of entertainment programming.

Film Review: “Kraven the Hunter”

 

  • KRAVEN THE HUNTER
  • Starring:  Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Ariana Dubose and Russell Crowe
  • Directed by:  J.C. Chandor
  • Rated:  R
  • Running time:  2 hrs 7 mins
  • Columbia Pictures

 

Our score:  3.5 out of 5

 

Sometimes the Marvel Cinematic Universe is confusing.  The majority of films based on Marvel Comics characters are all related in some way to others, seamlessly stringing along a story that has stretched for decades.  “Iron Man.”  The Tom Holland “Spider-Man” series.  “Doctor Strange.”  They all go together like another piece in a giant jigsaw puzzled.  However, for every one of those films, you have characters like Deadpool, the X-men and Howard the Duck, whose films are basically stand alone stories, though Howard the Duck does make a brief appearance in the coda of the first “Guardians of the Galaxy” film.  Add to the latter list “Kraven the Hunter,” best known to comic fans as Spider-man’s foe.  Not here though.

 

Sergei and Dimitri Kravinoff (Levi Miller and Billy Barratt) are two young men attending a posh private school in upstate New York.  One day they are informed that their father will be calling on them.  Soon a long, black car pulls up.  The boys get in.  Their destination will change both of their lives forever.

 

As I always note when I’m reviewing a comic book film, the only ones I read as a kid were Batman and Superman.  I knew Spider-Man from the Saturday morning cartoons, but I was, and still am, much better versed in the D.C. Universe.  So not only wasn’t I aware of  Kraven’s Spider-Man association, I didn’t even know he was a comic book character.  That being said, he’s pretty darn cool!

 

While on safari with his brother and father, a Russian bad guy brilliantly portrayed by Crowe, Serfei is attacked by a lion and dragged away.  A young girl, whose grandmother has provided her with a special potion that heals anyone who drinks it.  She gives some to the badly mauled Sergei, who is rushed to the hospital.  He survives, but he is now more animal than man.  He is a hunter.

Action packed from beginning to end, “Kraven the Hunter” is an unapologetic film where the nastier they bad guys fall, the happier the hero becomes.  Taylor-Johnson, who starred as the title character in “Kick-Ass” and gave an amazing performance as the young John Lennon in “Nowhere Boy,” is excellent here as the now-grown Sergei, who spends his days tracking down the worse of the worse and dispatching them to hell.   Younger brother Dimitri (Fred Hechinger) is more a lover then a fighter, earning his living as a lounge singer and disappointing his hard-ass father.  Hechinger seems to be attracted to these roles, having recently appeared as the less-then-tough Emperor Caracalla in “Gladiator II.”  Oscar winner DuBose does what she can with an underdeveloped role as the mystery girl who saved Sergei’s life, now all grown up.

 

But most people don’t go to action films for the acting.  They go for the action, and this film is packed with it.  Director Chandor sets a frantic pace and the cast keeps up with it.

 

On a scale of zero to five, I give “Kraven the Hunter” ★ ½

Film Review: “The Invisible Raptor”

Starring: Mikes Capes, David Shackleford and Caitlin McHugh Stamos
Directed by: Mike Hermosa
Rated: NR
Running Time: 114 minutes
Well Go USA Entertainment

Our Score: 2.5 out of 5 Stars

“That’s a pretty cost effective way to make a creature feature.” This is everyone’s immediate thought when hearing about or seeing advertising for “The Invisible Raptor.” While the horror-comedy does make use of that gag, to the point of it being a bit unfunny and tired by the end, it makes up for that belief with a lot of practical effects, gore and violence. So, if the title alone is enough, you may just be the audience for “The Invisible Raptor.”

A secret lab is working with a genetically modified raptor that can’t be seen and has the intelligence we’ve come to recognize with the creature from “Jurassic Park” films. Of course the invisible and highly intelligent creature escapes, after making mince meat of stunt casted Sean Astin in professor garb. The invisible predator sets its sights on a nearby town, neighborhood, county, whatever and creates havoc. Unfortunately for the set of townspeople we meet, Dr. Grant Walker (Mike Capes), a shamed paleontologist who now works at an amusement park, is ready to believe in and save the day from the invisible raptor. Helping on this journey is his bumbling doofy co-worker Denny (David Shackelford) and his ex-girlfriend who still kind of wants him, Amber (Caitlin McHugh Stamos).

The likeable nature of our characters, the over-the-top nature of the story, combined with the over-the-top violence, should make this the kind of film that’s beloved by the few who watch it like “Wolf Cop.” But the film is way too long and struggles to connect it’s opening and closing acts. While Dr. Walker and Denny make a fantastic raptor hunting duo, there’s only so many times we can watch them show up when it’s too late or hear another story about Dr. Walker was shamed from his profession or why Denny is the laughing stock of the town, neighborhood, county; whatever. I’m very much in the firm belief that you have to have a damn good reason to make a horror or comedy that’s longer than 80-90 minutes. It can be done, but “The Invisible Raptor” is not one of them.

As much as I’d like to recommend “The Invisible Raptor,” based solely on charm and childish comedic wit, the film begins inhaling fumes before the credits even begin to roll. That being said, I think about all the times I’ve been trapped watching a comedy that doesn’t manage to land a single good joke, (the director/writer duo of Friedberg and Seltzer made at least a dozen of these) and I kind of warm to the idea of “The Invisible Raptor” still being a decent gore rid with comedic chops. Ultimately, “The Invisible Raptor” is up to how much you’re willing to stomach the comedy-horror genre or how much you love creature features. I’m not disappointed that I watched “The Invisible Raptor,” I’m just disappointed it wasn’t better.

Film Review: “Moana 2”

 

  • MOANA 2
  • Starring the voices of:  Auli’i Cravalho, Dwayne Johnson and Alan Tudyk
  • Directed by:  David G. Derrick Jr., ason HandDana and Ledoux Miller
  • Rated:  PG
  • Running time:  1 hr 40 mins
  • Walt Disney Pictures

Our score:  3.5 out of 5 

On an island somewhere in the ocean, a young girl and her companions – a pig and a chicken – make their way to the top of a mountain.  There they can look out over the land.  The girl, named Moana (Cravalho) blows into a large conch shell, hoping to get a response.  But she is only greeted by silence.  Maybe next time?

 

A beautifully presented continuation of the 2016 hit, “Moana 2” finds our title character growing up and mounting a long, dangerous tip to the far seas of Oceania, where she is convinced she will find other civilizations.  Besides her two animal pals, she is accompanied on the journey by youthful Moni (Hualalai Chung), the industrious Simea ( Khaleesi Lambert-Tsuda), and the elder Kele (David Fane).  Their trip is full of peris, with each day bringing a new adventure.

It is amazing what can be done with animation these days.  I’ve always found the hardest things to animate realistically are hair and water.  Something always made them seem just a little…”off.”  Not here.  The film is beautifully rendered and the ocean waves are so realistic you may find yourself ducking for fear of getting wet when they splash onto the shore.  The story is straightforward but quite dark at times.  Thankfully there are brief respites of humor, most of it provided by the amazing Maui (Johnson), obviously having fun with the role.  The other characters are standard Disney-fare – Moni could be a distant relative of “Beauty and the Beast” tough-guy Gaston, while Kele is the atypical “the sky is falling” character, casting doubt at every turn.  But, also following in the Disney tradition, are some great songs beautifully performed.

 

Overall, while younger children may be frightened by some of the images, the older ones (my two grandchildren included) should have a fun time.

 

On a scale of zero to five I give “Moana 2” ★1/2.

Film Review: “Gladiator II”

 

  • GLADIATOR II
  • Starring:  Paul Mescal, Pedro Pascal, and Denzel Washington
  • Directed by:  Ridley Scott
  • Rated:  R
  • Running time:  2 hrs 28 mins
  • Paramount 

Our score:  4.5 out of 5

Screenwriter Carl Gottlieb once noted that “the only sequel to lose money is the last one.”  Translated, it means that Hollywood Is not afraid to stick a number at the end of a film title and will continue to do so until people stop showing up.  So I was very apprehensive when I heard that a sequel to the Oscar-winning “Gladiator,” release almost a quarter century ago.  I’m happy to report that I needn’t have worried.

 

Rome.  While once a mighty city rulled by beloved men, it has deteriorated into a city of unrest.  While Rome was founded by brothers Romulus and Remus, it is now run by the Latin versions of Tweedledum and Tweedledee, brothers Geta (Joseph Quinn) and Caracalla (Fred Hechinger).  When the two aren’t bickering over the smallest perceived injustice they are sending their best general, Marcus Acacius (Pascal) to conquer every neighboring city.  When his latest attack takes the wife of an opposing soldier, vengeance is sworn.  But how to get it?

 

On my short list of film directors who criminally have never won an Academy Award for their work, Ridley Scott is right at the top.  With films like “Alien,” “Bladerunner,” “Thelma and Louise,”  “Blackhawk Down,” and, of course, “Gladiator,” he has crafted some of the best films of the past five decades.  You can now add “Gladiator II” to the list.

The film follows the vengeance-seeking soldier, (Mescal) after his capture.  His fighting spirit leads him to be chosen to train to fight in the Colosseum, championed by Macrimus (the always brilliant Denzel Washington).  As he hones his skills by fighting everything from giant, wild monkeys to rhinoceroses, he continues to win, driven by the thought of one day hoisting Acacius’ head.  And a memory.

 

Action-packed, “Gladiator II” is wall-to-wall adventure.  Like the original film, the dialogue is short and direct while the action is over the top.  Scott’s pacing keeps the film moving quickly and the visual effects are top-of-the-line.  The film does have an association with the original Oscar-winning film, but to say more would spoil the surprise!

 

On a scale of zero to five, I give “Gladiator II” ★★★★1/2. 

Film Review: “Whiteout”

Starring: James McDougall, Douglas Nyback and Joel Labelle
Directed by: Derek Barnes
Rated: R
Running Time: 91 minutes
Saban Films

Our Score: 2.5 out of 5 Stars

Movies don’t always have to have plots. In fact, there’s the saying that too much plot gets in the way of the story, which basically means the film’s vibe. Some people’s favorite films are all about the vibe, more than it is the actual story. A lot of coming-of-age films are about relating to the character or movies like “The Big Lebowski” thrive on it’s characters, as opposed to the rug and kidnapping mystery. So, when a film like “Whiteout” comes along, you have to wonder, “What does it thrives on??

The film hooks you immediately by opening with Russian men kidnapping several individuals from an office complex. The men from the office are sent to labor camps while the few women we see in the background at the office…are probably sent to something worse. “Whiteout” follows Henry (James McDougall), who quickly, after the opening, ends up being involved with the escape plans of two other different prisoners, Kurt (Douglas Nyback) and Anthony (Joel Labelle). While the trio survive a labor camp gun battle, they quickly find out they might not be able to survive the snowy, rocky elements of Mother Russia.

So, why were Russian men raiding the office complex? I don’t know. Why was Henry captured and sent to a miserable labor camp? I don’t know. Who are these two who’ve picked Henry for their escape? I don’t know. Why does everyone we encounter seem to be a sharpshooter? I don’t know. “Whiteout” is a vibe. That vibe is non-stop action, although it does reveal a little as the film progresses, but not enough to add stakes to the overarching plot. Which is unfortunate because it’d be nice to care about Henry’s plight, more than feeling bad for the out of shape tubby guy who has to deal with the worst from Old Man Winter and the lack of trust from those he’s escaped with. That being said, the movie isn’t as predictable as you might think as the third act delivers a few decent shocks.

While I wouldn’t necessarily recommend “Whiteout,” if you were to tell me you were going to watch it, I wouldn’t stop you from watching it. That being said, you really have to enjoy some mindless thrills and actions because you’re not going to get much in the way of thought provoking content. There’s a lot to enjoy from Derek Barnes in his debut feature. He really does capture the vast emptiness of the wilderness and some of the more unforgiving aspects of it. And even with a low budget, the action is incredibly choreographed and the suspense keeps you engaged even if Barnes didn’t know how to write anything beyond a basic plot.

Film Review: “Wicked – Part One”

 

  • WICKED – PART ONE
  • Starring:  Cynthia Erivo, Ariana Grande and Jeff Goldblum
  • Directed by:  Jon M. Chu
  • Rated:  PG
  • Running time: 2 hrs 41 mins
  • Universal

 Our Score: 5 out ot 5

Sometimes when you get your hopes up, they get dashed, especially when it comes to movie musicals.  For every “West Side Story,” you get a “Cats.”  For every “Les Miserables,” you get a “Cats.”  For every “La La Land” you get, well… “Cats.”  So you can imagine my trepidation as I sat down to see “Wicked.”  Thankfully, there was nothing to worry about.

 

Based on the still-running 2003 Broadway show of the same name, “Wicked” tells the story of two very different people whose lives are inevitably linked in Pop Culture.  The film begins with what could almost be a coda to “The Wizard of Oz.”  The wicked witch of the West has been killed and the residents of Oz are celebrating.  They are visited by Glinda (Grande), a beautiful witch who floats along in a bubble.  She confirms the witch’s death and begins to leave.  Before she can make her escape she is asked, “is it true that you and the wicked witch were once friends?”  And the story begins.

Where to start?  Among my fears was that devoting over two and half hours to the first act of the show, which only runs for ninety minutes on Broadway, would fill the screen with unnecessary clutter and nonsense.  But director Chu fills the screen with wonderful scenery, none of it wasted space.  He keeps the film moving at such a pace that you don’t realize you’ve spent nearly three hours sitting in the dark.

 

The cast is top notch.  As an “old guy” I am not familiar with any of Ariana Grande’s music.  That being said, I was blown away by her voice.  She also gives Glinda a likability that other actresses may not have been able to exude.  As Elphaba, the future wicked witch, Erivo excels at keeping the character grounded.  She has a sense of humor, which you most certainly need when you are green.  Her performance gives Elphaba a humanity that the audience can relate to.  It’s not her that’s bad, it’s those that bully her.

 

The film also has an inner message about accepting those around you and treating them as you would like to be treated, a message that is often forgotten in today’s world.  Fans of “The Wizard of Oz” will find many Easter Eggs and homages to the 1939 film.  And fans of the original Broadway show may even see some familiar faces.

 

But it’s the music that makes “Wicked” what it is, and each and every song are presented magnificently.  Both Glinda and Elphaba are iconic roles and it would have been easy for the cast, especially Ms. Grande and Ms. Erivo, to play it safe and sing the songs in the style familiar with audiences.  But both of them bring a new spin to the songs.  Even if you’re a fan of the show you feel like you are hearing these songs for the first time.

 

If you can’t tell by the title, “Wicked” is being presented in two parts, with part two hitting theatres next November.  Take it from me and get in line now!

 

On a scale of zero to five, I give “Wicked – Part One” ★★★

4K Review: “Twisters”

 

Those pesky cyclones of destruction return for Lee Isaac Chung’s sequel-in-spirit Twisters. An indirect followup to the ‘90s fan-favorite disaster flick, we find a new generation of tornado chasers with Daisy Edgar-Jones, Glen Powell, and Anthony Ramos on the hunt to tame the most destructive force on the planet. On 4K UHD Twisters wins with an excellent Dolby Vision / Atmos combo and plenty of extra features.

 

If Hollywood loves to do one thing it’s make the same movie again with twice the budget. If there’s a thing most sequels lack it is originality. It’s easier to play it safe, do a version of the same thing again, shell out a gargantuan amount of cash, and hope audiences go for it. They do that because most often it works… unless they turn it into a jukebox musical. Now with Jan de Bont’s Twister, the film was a modest albeit not HUGE hit at the box office. It made money, but the film also wrapped things up well enough that a sequel wasn’t altogether needed or necessary. Attempts were made, but indy-darling Lee Isaac Chung got Twisters to the big screen without any returning original characters. In our sort-of pseudo-sequel, we have intrepid would-be tornado-tamer Kate (Daisy Edgar-Jones) living in New York. Years earlier she was part of a team of chasers with the dream of being able to stop a tornado, but tragedy destroyed their group. Now fellow survivor Javi (Anthony Ramos) turns up with new tech and an opportunity for redemption if Kate comes back to Oklahoma. But the chasing game has changed. On the scene are any number of amateur storm chasers including the YouTube famous Tornado Wrangler Tyler Owens (Glen Powell) ready to chase down the biggest twisters.

 

It’s weird to think of Twister as a franchise now, but it is. A long time coming, there were several attempts over the last 28 years to get a new film up the funnel. As he effectively edged into writing and directing, Bill Paxton had his own idea based on the notorious 1925 tri-state tornado that killed nearly 700 people. The plot would have been similar to this sequel where Paxton would be back behind the wheel of the red Dodge Ram with a space-aged material designed to stop tornadoes. But that pitch sadly didn’t get far before his untimely death. Then as of a few years ago Helen Hunt had her own plan to write and direct a sequel – but I’m not entirely sure of the plot, but obviously that didn’t get picked up. And now we have this spiritual sequel from director Lee Isaac Chung and writers Mark L. Smith and Joseph Kosinski (Maverick). I call this a spiritual sequel because it doesn’t pick up where the last one left off. It doesn’t feature any of the original characters, but this one doesn’t entirely ignore the first film either. During the very exciting opening sequence, we see a “field-tested” Dorthy 5 hooked up to Kate’s barrels of absorbent polymer to get important data. And that’s all the acknowledgment this film offers of the original. Unlike so damn many recent legacy sequels, this one isn’t saturated with constant callbacks or nostalgia bombs. It’s certainly not entirely original, but it wisely doesn’t try to do the exact same plot twice. I mean both films are about people trying to give tornados a scientific instrument suppository, but how they achieve that mission is very different.

 

Best of all, it’s just as cornball, it’s just as silly, and just as much fun as the first. What I really enjoyed about Twisters was how it ramped up the amount of death and property destruction. Each tornado gets bigger and more deadly with people caught in the path and sucked up to meet their makers. With the big budget and advancements in visual effects, they could afford to do more destructive chaos right through to a thrilling climax at a small-town movie theater. That said, what holds this one back is we’ve seen CGI tornadoes before. There’s already a sense of familiarity going into this film and even with bigger more deadly and more flammable tornadoes, Twisters just can’t quite muster up the same sense of dread and primal terror of the 1996 original. To be fair, this film has its share of great and memorable sequences, the best hits a rodeo (with a cameo from Bill Paxton’s son). Also working in this film’s favor is it avoids trying to ape the romance/drama of the Paxton/Hunt dynamic. There’s an obvious chemistry between Powell and Edgar-Jones, but this film wisely avoids going down that road again. However I personally found it more interesting regarding the plot.

 

So sure, not an incredible film, not as great as the first, but I enjoyed the hell out of it. It was great seeing this on IMAX with my fiancée, who actually was more excited to see it than me. And while I enjoyed the hell out of Twisters in the theater, it’s just as much fun at home with my 4K screen and Atmos rig. The action is big and loud. The characters are colorful and fun. The titular cyclones are plenty windy and destructive. About all you need for a tornado flick.

 

 PICTURE

 Smashing onto 4K disc, Twisters devours 2160p with an excellent Dolby Vision transfer. From frame one all the way through to the end, this is a crisp, clean, detailed image. Shot on 35mm and finished with a 4K Digital Intermediate, the image maintains a film-like appearance with a naturally cinematic grain structure. Fine lines, facial features, and production design details are razor-sharp. I was really impressed with how well the CGI effects appear here. Time and technology have worked in this sequel’s favor for creating some big-scale tornado destruction. A lot of effort was used to combine practical effects with digital counterparts so a lot of the time the big wow moments have true weight to them. A few pieces here and there can look a tad cartoonish – Powell running from the disabled tram car always looked janky and still does on disc. The rest of the time the film looks great. Colors are right where they need to be, big bold with great saturation. Thanks to Dolby Vision those reds, blues, and yellows really pop nicely. Whites are well-balanced against the dark ominous shadows. Again that rodeo sequence is a highlight moment that hits all those marks. All around a damn near-perfect transfer.

 

SOUND

On the audio front, Universal delivers a rousing wall-to-wall Atmos mix to match their impressive Dolby Vision transfer. I mean, it’s a disaster movie with massive tornados, it’d be a huge failing on Universal’s part to crap the bed here. I really enjoyed the mix for this one because it really played with the creepy silence that happens during a big storm where you think everything is going to be fine before all hell breaks loose. And when hell comes it hits on all channels. Shipping wind effects beautifully circulate throughout the soundscape rising upwards into the heights. Heights are thankfully not only reserved for wind or rain, any time a hapless NPC gets sucked up their screams fly into the heights. Likewise, the bursts of fireworks are a fun highlight. Dialog isn’t lost, but like any disaster movie, we’re not here for the quality of the flowery speeches, we want to enjoy the chaos on screen rattling our walls, ceilings, and floorboards! The big El Reno finale delivers all of that. As each tornado escalates in intensity, so does the mix. By the end, the LFE is rattling away while the front/center, side, rear, and height channels do their work. Crank the volume and let ‘er rip!

 

SPECIAL FEATURES

What’s particularly nice to see is Universal didn’t skimp on the extra features. You get a great director’s commentary track, some fun gag reels, some deleted scenes, and plenty of featurettes to gnaw through once the main feature is done. The commentary is probably the most informative piece you can enjoy if you’re really into “how it was done, what it took to do this, yadda yadda” but the featurettes are still enjoyable even if they lean a little more EPK fodder. The Deleted Scenes aren’t all that extensive and feel likewise pacing cuts rather than missing subplots or character development. Bonus features are on both discs.

 

FINAL WORD

I went to the theater for big tornado destruction fun and got exactly what I wanted. It helps that Lee Isaac Chung, the writers, and the solid cast actually made a solid pseudo-sequel to the 1996 original. It might not be better (but it’s more interesting), but it thankfully doesn’t repeat itself or saturate it with numbing nostalgia callbacks. Twisters has its own wildly entertaining fun to have on the big screen letting it stand alongside the original without feeling like a complete repeat. On 4K UHD, Twisters storms (pun intended) onto disc with an excellent Dolby Vision transfer with a fantastic Atmos mix to match. Tag in about an hour of genuinely interesting extra features on top of a commentary track and you’ve got a damn good home release. Highly Recommended!

 

Film ⭐️⭐️⭐️

Picture ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Sound ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Extras ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

(out of five stars)

Film Review: “Red One”

 

  • RED ONE
  • Starring:  Dwayne Johnson, Chris Evans and J.K. Simmons
  • Directed by:  Jake Kasdan
  • Rated:  PG 13
  • Running time:  2 hrs 3 mins
  • Amazon/MGM Studios

 Our score 3.5 out of 5

 

With the holiday’s approaching, many of us are already preparing for the upcoming festivities.  That includes a certain gentleman named Nicholas who lives at the North Pole.  But he can’t do it alone.  Meet Cal Drift (Johnson), Santa’s head of security.  He’s about to retire after several centuries on the job but he’s staying around for one more sleigh ride, one he will never forget.

 

There aren’t a lot of Christmas-themed action films.  There’s “Die Hard” and there’s, well, “Die Hard.”  “Red One” – Santa’s code name – is no “Die Hard,” but it is an entertaining two hours of fun.  The film begins in the mid 199os, where a family gathering introduces us to young Jack O’Malley (Wyatt Hunt), a boy who doesn’t believe in Santa Claus, quite possibly because he is sure to have been on the infamous “naughty” list.  Jump ahead to today and we learn that the adult Jack (Evans) is still a rotten person who actually DOES take candy from a baby.  Jack is known in certain unsavory crowds as the “Wolf,” a con man who can get you almost anything you want.  His current client is looking for Santa (Simmons) and his secrets.  When the big man is kidnapped Jack and Cal form an unlikely team to save him.

The film’s believability rests solely on the shoulders of the cast, who all give fine performances.  Johnson has continued to grow as an actor and he has an uncanny ability to appear both tough and tender at the same time.  Evans, as a father who has kept himself out of his young son’s life, is also well cast.  Simmons, one of the greatest character actors ever, is also solid, giving what could have been a very routine role some emotional depth.  Bonnie Hunt as Mrs. Claus and Lucy Liu as the Director of the security agency.  Special mention to Kristofer Hivju, who steals scenes as the fun-loving, not evil, Krampus.

 

The effects are well done and the action set pieces well crafted.  Not sure how many little ones will enjoy this – some of the humor is a little over their heads – but kids love Christmas.  Except for young Jack O’Malley that is.

 

Overall, I recommend you get in your sleigh and head out over the river and through the woods to see “Red One.”

 

On a scale of zero to five I give “Red One” ★1/2

 

 

Film Review: “Dream Team”

Starring: Esther Garel, Alex Zhang Huntai and Isabelle Barbier
Directed by: Lev Kalman and Whitney Horn
Rated: NR
Running Time: 91 minutes
Yellow Veil Pictures

Our Score: 1.5 out of 5 Stars

As a product of the 90s (technically born in the 80s, but predominantly remember the 90s), I feel like I know what “Dream Team” is going for. The movie bills itself as an “absurdist homage to 90s basic cable TV thrillers.” That triggers memories of “La Femme Nikita,” “The Pretender,” and “The X-Files.” The 90s is also considered the golden age of erotic thrillers with films like “Body of Evidence,” “Basic Instinct” and “Wild Things.” I’m sure I’m name dropping a lot of content that conjures fond memories, but “Dream Team” isn’t able to.

“Dream Team” is about two INTERPOL agents, played by Esther Garel and Alex Zhang Hungtai, investigating mysterious deaths which may or may not be linked to gaseous coral. That’s the plot in a nutshell, but because this is a mysterious 90s thriller, the film is filled with non sequitur character introductions, soap opera subplots, bad practical effects, cringey dialogue, and a lot of unspoken hornyness. This isn’t really a movie though. The film is presented like a VHS of recorded episodes, with the film broken up with episode title cards. It looks and feels like an homage, but it never comes full circle.

The biggest problem in “Dream Team” is that the movie doesn’t seem to know what to do in between some of the more clever moments of the film, like the antiquated technology jokes, incompetent investigation skills and the intentionally shoehorned unsexy sexual moments. The problem is, there’s not an interesting bare bones story to follow along with. There are also long moments of B-roll like waves crashing on the shore, sea creatures just derping about, or shots of the beach. Some of these scenes last for several minutes, almost as if it was begging me to check my latest phone notification.

The movie is tackling 90s erotic thrillers in a way that’s reminiscent of “NTSF:SD:SUV” or “Children’s Hospital,” a bonkers reality where everyone is Leslie Nielsen in “Airplane!” But the problem is that there isn’t a cast and crew stocked with comedic chops. There were moments where I wondered if the cast was interpreting the script correctly because of the different approaches. At other times I felt like the film was telling an inside joke that I wasn’t privy to. It’s also quite possible I’m not a connoisseur of bad 90s like directors/writers Lev Kalman and Whitney Horn. While I’m sure there’s a niche audience for this,  “Dream Team” is, like most of my dreams, forgettable.

Film Review: “Here”

 

  • HERE
  • Starring:  Tom Hanks and Robin Wright
  • Directed by:  Robert Zemeckis
  • Rated: PG 13
  • Running time:  1 hr 44 mins
  • Miramax

 

In 1994, “Forrest Gump” became a phenomenon, winning 6 Academy Awards, including Best Picture, and grossing over $670 million worldwide.  Thirty years later, most of the creative team behind the film return for a new family drama, “Here.”

 

I think we all have our favorite memories about our childhood homes.  My father worked for the newspapers and by the time I was 15 we had lived in six different cities in various states.  My favorite memories were created in a house in Cleveland.  I used to visit the house whenever I was in town.  Even after 40 years I could tell you the layout, where my room was, etc.  It broke my heart in 2020 when I last visited to find that it had been torn down. “Here” not only takes place in a home, but actually in the living room of a home, spanning the length of time.  From the dinosaurs that roamed the land where the house would eventually be built to where it stands today.

 

Though told in a non-linear fashion, the film focuses mostly on the family that purchases the home shortly after World War II, remaining in it for several decades.  As the film progresses, we get intimate glimpses, framed like snapshots, of the various lives lived within those four walls.  Good times and bad, dramatic moments and times of sheer joy,  the audience is privy every secret.

One can’t help watch this film and be reminded of the creative team’s previous film, “Forrest Gump.”  As history goes by, we run into a few well known p;eople.  It’s not as hit-on-the-head obvious as in “Gump,” but what are the odds that Ben Franklin used to live across the street?  The musical score, by Alan Silvestri, echoes the Oscar nominated score he wrote for “Gump.”  Finally, a hummingbird, whose appearances bookend the film, is reminiscent of the famous “Gump” feather.

 

The film is well cast and it’s great to see Hanks and Wright back together on screen.  The film follows them from their teenage years until late adulthood, and the de-aging process used here is spot on.  The younger versions of the actors are quite believable, and fare much better than the process used in “The Irishman.”

 

Overall, the film is an interesting piece of cinema and definitely worth taking a trip to the theatre for.

 

On a scale of zero to five, “Here” receives ★★★1/2.

Copyright: MediaMikes.com © 2024 · Powered by: nGeneYes, Inc. · Login

All logos and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies. All Rights Reserved. Some of the content presented on our sites has been provided by contributors, other unofficial websites or online news sources, and is the sole responsibility of the source from which it was obtained. MediaMikes.com is not liable for inaccuracies, errors, or omissions found herein. For removal of copyrighted images, trademarks, or other issues, Contact Us.