Robert Englund is known best for his iconic role of Freddy Krueger in the “Nightmare on Elm Street” series. Ā Robert is such a legend in the horror genre. Ā He is co-starring in Syfy’s “Lake Placid: The Final Chapter”, which airs on September 29th. Ā Robert took out some time to chat about the film and reflect on his career and his alter ego Freddy Krueger.
Mike Gencarelli: How did you get involved with “Lake Placid: The Final Chapter”?
Robert Englund: Well, Iāve been involved with the SyFy channel several times over the years. Iāve pitched projects to them and recently I just pitched a reality show to them, and Iāve done TV movies for them. Every boy has to fight his giant snake, his killer bees, and when they called me to fight giant alligators, I signed up. I was at a premiere for a film in Barcelona with my wife and all I had was a tuxedo, and a dress suit, and a couple of shirts, and a couple of pairs of underwear when I got the call for Lake Placid. So I went directly from Barcelona, with hardly any luggage, to Sofia, Bulgaria. And there is a lake just outside the capital of Bulgaria, thatās exactly like, itās the exact same kind of geological features as Maine. Itās got that rocky shoreline and the exact same kind of pine trees. Itās amazing, I thought I was – I was looking around for lobster rolls it looked so much like Maine. I showed up and there was the lovely Elisabeth Rohm, who I had a crush on since the first time I saw her, you know, in court on Law and Order. And Yancy Butler, who Iāve known – not known, but Iāve run into over the years at Comic-Con and things because she had such a huge fan boy following with Witchblade, and we just all got to work. We worked real hard, real long days, because we were losing Indian Summer. We had a little bit of Indian Summer in the beginning, and it started getting pretty cold. We were all on the water all the time. Because thatās where the gators are, but yeah, it was really fun, you know, and the coincidence was when I got there and got picked up at the airport. It was guys Iād worked for years ago, you know, in a giant snake movie. So now they have a big huge studio, over there in Eastern Europe, and theyāre doing real well. In fact they shooting, Expendables right when we were wrapping, Expendables 2 came in and used a lot of our crew towards the end. So things are hopping in Romania.
MG: Tell us about shooting this film, was it difficult on a low budget?
RE:Ā Well, yes and no. What you have to understand is, if youāre shooting in Detroit or youāre shooting in Louisiana. Or youāre shooting in New Mexico, you know, you get these great tax rebates. And the same thing happens in Europe. Sometimes itās just because itās so beautiful there and you get this enhanced production value. And even though we had to pay to fly everybody over there, thereās already a huge studio and production company in Sofia, Bulgaria. Theyād been shooting a couple of Lake Placids there. So you get a big bang for your buck, which is nice. So you work hard and there is that problem of language with the foreign crew that youāre dealing with. And also just explaining yourself, or your taste, or trying to describe what you might require in terms of wardrobe or something. Because sometimes idioms can get convoluted. And so youāre always dealing with that, but Iāve done a lot of movies in Europe now.Ā So Iām kind of an old hand at that. I did a giant snake movie with these guys years ago. And even they had realized that Anaconda had a huge fan base, you know, the J-Lo film. And they already, a low budget version that weāre doing, they had a better snake effect than the movie Anaconda. Because thatās how fast and how quickly the technology grows in CGI and animation right now. If you watch a movie like Starship Troopers now, with my friend Casper Van Diem, you know, it looks old fashioned now. You can actually see the same bug getting shot, that theyāve used over and over again. Because CGI was so expensive back then. Itās kind of like the old cowboy movies where you see the same Indian getting shot off a horse as he circles the wagon train. And they show it like maybe 2 minutes later in the sequence as if we havenāt seen that before. Because they only had that stunt twice, and they use it again later in the movie. And itās like, āWait a minute, I saw that Indian get shot. I saw that fall, I saw him get his ankle caught in the stirrup and get dragged. I remember that.ā And itās the same thing with old CGI now, you see the repetition shots where they used them. Or you can kind of see where the mat just flips and continues the same foreground action in the background, slightly out of focus. Because they didnāt have enough soldiers in Troy that day. And so when I do these new movies, if Iām doing a SyFy channel movie with killer bees or giant alligators. It looks better than the last giant alligator in a feature film, you know, because thatās one of the reasons they do it. Because they figured out a better way to do it. And even though the movie may be less expensive, and a little exploitative, many times youāre actually getting a better effect.
MG:Ā If Jim Bickerman crossed paths with Freddy, what would his first words be to him? And if Freddy crossed paths with Jim, what would he think of him?
RE:Ā Well, Jim Bickerman is a pretty ornery guy. And he obviously would have to meet Freddy in his dreams, and I think Jim Bickermanās dreams are probably pretty strange. Heās a dirty old man that Jim Bickerman, as you saw in the film. So thereās probably some point where Jim Bickerman like of, they both like them teenage girls. Theyāre bad boys. So Iām sure that Jim Bickerman, before Freddy killed him would want to join forces with Freddy. Maybe Freddy could turn Jim Bickerman and the two of them could work together. I donāt know if it would be Bickerman versus Krueger. Freddy is always going to win, and once you fall asleep Freddy gets the drop on you.
MG:Ā Throughout your career has there been anything that has given you nightmares or maybe something that you are scared of?
RE:Ā Nothing really scares me. When I did the first Nightmare film, I mean thereās films that scare me, I just even got a jolt the other night watching Cabin in the Woods. And I remember the original Alien got me several times, and I was a grown up when I saw that, and I dragged my poor father to see it. But now, when I was in the makeup for the original Freddy, I fell asleep, we were shooting nights. And I fell asleep trying to get a nap and the AD banged on the door and said, āMr. Englund hurry up weāre going to try and get this shot before the sun comes up.ā And I sat up, and I forgot, this was during the first film, forgetting I was in this make-up. I sat up with, you know, that kind of bad breath you have after a little nap, and I rolled off of my cot in my little tiny, you know, honey wagon dressing room. And there in the recesses, in the forced perspective of my make-up mirror, opposite my bunk, surrounded by dim light bulbs – make-up light bulbs, that had been cranked down on the dimmer. I saw this old bald man with scars and burns all over him looking back at me. I kind of went, āOh geez.ā And I put my hand on my head and so did he. So it became this sort of nightmarish Marx brothers routine. And it literally took me about the count of 5 or 6 to kind of come out of that semi-conscious state youāre in when you wake up real fast. And, you know, when youāre fighting for the alarm clock. That kind of moment of time. I was very disoriented. The point of this story is that moment, looking into the mirror, which I recovered from in 5 to 6 seconds, but that moment, I can remember it like it was yesterday. And occasionally, and I donāt want to like guilt the lily here, but occasionally that does enter into my subconscious and it does get into a dream, or it comes in as a random image thatās still stored in my brain somewhere. Because it was so disorienting. Thereās that funny distancing of where I was sitting, and then the mirror 2 or 3 feet from me. And then in an equally far back and deep in the mirror Freddy, looking back at Robert. Because I was Robert obviously. But that really was a strange moment, and it was so early in the film experience for me, of horror films. I had been doing a lot of very normal fair up until then, except for science fiction. That really did disorient me, and it did stay with me, and do a little kind of a – I think thereās a definite crease in my gray matter that makes a home for that image.
MG:Ā With you being a horror icon and legend; Do you ever kind of feel pressured to hold up that title? How would you feel that the genre has changed over the years for you?
RE:Ā Well I get a lot of scripts, in fact, as Iām talking to you right now Iām behind one script at least. And there is one that I have to download and print out. But, I donāt like feel a pressure. The back of my mind, Iām always looking. Iām trying to help out right now with a project, I did a cult film a couple of years ago called Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon. Thatās really a great, smart film. And so I – the sequel script to that is just phenomenal. Itās the second best sequel script of something Iāve done Iāve seen in a long, long time. There was a great one years ago for a great contemporary spinoff of Phantom of the Opera. I had done a Phantom of the Opera over in Europe and the follow-up script – the reason I did the original was because the follow-up script was so strong and interesting and really great contemporary version of an extension of the Phantom of the Opera legend and myth. But this one, you know, so Iām always kind of looking Mike. Iāve always got one eye peeking or one ear open for something that I want to do in horror. Thatās different, or that I just think – even if itās derivative is really strong. And also because I get – to be honest with you, when I do a genre piece I get a bigger pay day. Than if Iām just guest starring on, you know, Criminal Minds or Hawaii Five-0, or Bones or something. Then Iām just Robert Englund, character actor again. And when I do my little horror movies like Inkubus, that I brought out last Halloween on DVD, when I do my little down and dirty horror movies Iām getting more money. Or when I got over to Europe to play a Prince in some strange cult film in Spain or something, itās a nice payday for me. So I do make an effort to do one or two a year, just on an economic level let alone. But Iām always looking, Iām always looking for that new one. I spent a year and a half in Italy scouting locations, and casting, and talking to Christopher Lee, and Donald Sutherland, for a project back in 2006/2007 that did not come to fruition. And that was very disappointing for me, you know, that takes a lot out of you when you get to be my age, spending a year of your life. Iām obviously turning down other projects if Iām trying to develop something. So, you kind of have to be careful. So I just now see the stuff thatās sent to me. Iām not really developing it on my own. But I am always checking the stuff thatās sent to me and trying to keep current on that.
MG:Ā Looking back at your iconic role of Freddy Krueger, have you ever regretting taking this role?
RE:Ā No, Iāve never regretted taking the role or my association with the great Wes Craven, and the success it brought me. You know, both economic and career success. Now, am I somewhat funneled into genre films, yes I am. Iāve done, Iāve done, I think Iām about to do, Iām about to start my 77th movie. Feature length film. And I think literally if you added up all my horror movies I think itās less than 20. So horror movies less than 20, thereās another 55 films that Iāve done. Now, a couple of those are sci-fi, some of them are thrillers, you know, some of them are a little bit fantasy. But most of them are just other movies that Iāve done. And, or TV movies. Iāve done a lot of quality TV movies as well. So theyāre not really out and out horror. So, but the thing that Iāve been telling people that this happy accident for me is the fact that after I got out of the make-up and I got enough baggage and enough reputation that Iāve sort of become like a surrogate Vincent Price, a surrogate Klaus Kinski. A go to guy for those roles, and somebody has to do that and you know, we donāt really have a Cary Grant, or a Steve McQueen anymore. But if I can kind of fit into Vincent Priceās loafers, or Klaus Kinskiās boots a little bit. Even if itās a low budget genre film, which both of those gentlemen did a lot of. I can remember seeing Dr. Phibes, you know, (unintelligible) the day it came out. Iām happy to be that guy. I do a lot of other things. Tomorrow I go to work on a little send-up spoof on workaholics for comedy central. And Iāve been guest starring on all of the top 10 shows in the last year. You know, Iāve been on Criminal Minds, and Bones, and Hawaii Five-0 doing just guest starring on those, doing normal roles. So, itās fun for me to do these. And Iāll be honest with you guys, I get paid better. If I do a horror movie or a science fiction movie, I get paid more because I fill the seats. Especially in certain countries, I can still open a movie, for instance, in Spain and Italy, and even in Germany to a degree. So that, thereās enough genre fans there, and theyāve been fans long enough. And as long as our sort of early Comic-Con fans, that thatās just another benefit that I bring to the table.
MG:Ā With people being so desensitized in films and horror. What would you say it takes to make a good scary movie these days?
RE:Ā Well scary is subjective. I think there is room now for all different splits. Just like there is in music. You know, Lake Placid has some real jumps in it. Lake Placid 4, weāve got some real jumps in it. And thereās something really primal. Thatās about a part of the brain that goes back to when we were reptiles. Itās an instinct that we have. And thereās also a little something in us that makes us afraid of snakes, and afraid of spiders, and afraid of alligators, and crocodiles. And so those thrills come easy in ours. But thereās also room for the fun. Thereās a certain amount of fun, I think, a little bit of undercurrent fun in a Lake Placid movie. I mean, we kill our teenagers, but thereās a little bit of fun in it too. I think there has to be room for all of these. I just saw a very clever movie last week on demand, with a cocktail in one hand and a cold pizza slice in the other, and my wife with her head in my lap. We watched The Cabin in the Woods and I really thought it was clever, and smart, and well-acted, and sexy. And it scared me, at least three or four times. It really got me, and Iām hard to get. Some things can be creepy though, thereās creepy scary. The great director Lucky McKee, very underrated. A film called May, he did a film called May that really is a creepy, creepy great film. So I like that too, you know, and sometimes Iām a little more distanced from films and I just love them for the actual film-making in them. And they may not scare me as much, but they may have a creepy factor too. The Brian DePalma film Sisters. That movie really kind of works on me. Thereās something hypnotic about that film. Plus the split screen and the use of microfiche flashbacks in a dream sequence that was induced by drugs. Thereās a really great, primal, primitive, early, kind of hallucinogenic hypnotizing quality to that. You know, you see that in old George Stevenās movies, and you see it even in classic films like Black Narcissus. Sometimes those movies become hypnotic. Thereās something kind of hypnotic even in the recent Kirsten Dunst film Melancholia. But I like that, when that starts to happen to me in horror and science fiction, you know, I think Cameron can get into that. Iāve seen Cameron get into that before. I think especially in the Alien movies, thereās a point where thereās no dialogue for so long and time is suspended. And we hear the breathing. And I love that, that really, I love that disorienting, hypnotic quality of films. And thatās just as effective to me as horror or the cheap thrills scare. The William Castle lunge into frame, you know?
MG:Ā Iām actually a huge fan of “Behind the Mask”. Iām actually a backer on the sequel. So I canāt wait for that to come out…
RE:Ā Well Iām telling you, the script is phenomenal. Because it plays with the great pun that fans love of doppelgangers. So thereās actually actors playing us, the actors who played the parts in the original. Making a movie, about the story of the original. About Leslie Vernon and his tale. And weāve been hired as technical advisors. And the whole project is being filmed by a Making of crew of a cable channel. So itās a movie, within a movie, within a movie. And itās all during the making of a movie, on the location of the movie. In the motel with all of the cast and the crew. And they start going down like ten little Indians. Itās really layered, and rich, and fun. And thereās a great gimmick with the actor theyāre going to get to play, the actor, the Hollywood actor who will be playing Leslie Vernon. He gets to finally have a showdown with the real Leslie Vernon, which I think is fun. And you wonāt know who he is, because heās a method actor. He wears the mask for the whole movie, itās really fun.
MG:Ā What else do you have planned next?
RE: Tell people to look for me in Sanitarium with Malcolm McDowell, and John Glover, and Lou Diamond Phillips, and Iām off to shoot this, which is very kind of M. Night Shyamalan-ian. Iām going to be doing that next month, and yeah, and everybody tune in and check out. Itās really fun. Lake Placid 4, yeah. Freddy versus Yancy Butler. Thanks a lot.
One Reply to “Robert Englund chats about new film “Lake Placid: The Final Chapter” and reflects on playing Freddy Krueger”